2009 Uncodified Act - Chapter 685

2009 Virginia Uncodified Acts

11/5/2024

CHAPTER 685

An Act to amend and reenact § 4.3 and Exhibit A, Attachment 1 and Attachment 2 of Exhibit D, and Exhibit F of the first enactment of Chapters 933 and 943 of the Acts of Assembly of 2006; § 4.3 and Exhibit G, Attachment 1 of Exhibit J, and Exhibit L of the second enactment of Chapters 933 and 943 of the Acts of Assembly of 2006; § 4.3 and Exhibit M, Attachment 1 and Attachment 2 of Exhibit P, and Exhibit R of the third enactment of Chapters 933 and 943 of the Acts of Assembly of 2006; the fifth enactment of Chapters 933 and 943 of the Acts of Assembly of 2006; § 4.3, Attachment 1 of Exhibit D, and Exhibit F of the first enactment of Chapters 594 and 616 of the Acts of Assembly of 2008; and the third enactment of Chapters 594 and 616 of the Acts of Assembly of 2008, relating to the management agreements between the Commonwealth and Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, the College of William and Mary in Virginia, the University of Virginia, and Virginia Commonwealth University, respectively.

[S 1156]

Approved March 30, 2009

Be it enacted by the General Assembly of Virginia:

1. That § 4.3 and Exhibit A, Attachment 1 and Attachment 2 of Exhibit D, and Exhibit F of the first enactment of Chapter 933 of the Acts of Assembly of 2006; § 4.3 and Exhibit G, Attachment 1 of Exhibit J, and Exhibit L of the second enactment of Chapter 933 of the Acts of Assembly of 2006; § 4.3 and Exhibit M, Attachment 1 and Attachment 2 of Exhibit P, and Exhibit R of the third enactment of Chapter 933 of the Acts of Assembly of 2006; and the fifth enactment of Chapter 933 of the Acts of Assembly of 2006 are amended and reenacted as follows:

SECTION 4.3. Term of Agreement. This Management Agreement shall expire at midnight on June 30, ~~2010~~ 2012, provided that on or before November 15, 2011, the Governor provides to the Chairmen of the House Committee on Appropriations and the Senate Committee on Finance written notification that this Management Agreement needs to be renegotiated or revised. If such notification is not received, this Management Agreement shall continue in effect until June 30, 2015.

EXHIBIT A

MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT

BETWEEN

THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA

AND

VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE

AND STATE UNIVERSITY

PURSUANT TO

THE RESTRUCTURED HIGHER EDUCATION

FINANCIAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE OPERATIONS

ACT OF 2005

POLICY GOVERNING

CAPITAL PROJECTS

THE BOARD OF VISITORS OF VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE

AND STATE UNIVERSITY

POLICY GOVERNING CAPITAL PROJECTS

I. PREAMBLE.

The Restructured Higher Education Financial and Administrative Operations Act (the Act), Chapter 4.10 of Title 23 of the Code of Virginia, provides that, upon becoming a Covered Institution, the University may be delegated the authority to establish its own system for undertaking the implementation of its capital projects. In general, status as a Covered Institution is designed to replace the post-authorization system of reviews, approvals, policies and procedures carried out by a variety of central State agencies, and also the traditional preauthorization approval process for projects funded entirely with non-general funds and without any proceeds from State Tax Supported Debt. The University's system for carrying out its capital outlay process as a Covered Institution is to be governed by policies adopted by the Board of Visitors. The following provisions of this Policy, together with the Policy Governing the Procurement of Goods, Services, Insurance, and Construction, and the Disposition of Surplus Materials adopted by the Board, and the Rules Governing Procurement of Goods, Services, Insurance, and Construction, which is attached as Attachment 1 to that Policy, constitute the adopted Board of Visitors policies regarding the University’s capital projects, whether funded by a state general fund appropriation, State Tax Supported Debt, or funding from other sources. This Policy is intended to encompass and implement the authority that may be granted to the University pursuant to Subchapter 3 of the Act. Any other powers and authorities granted to the University pursuant to the Appropriation Act, or any other sections of the Code of Virginia, including other provisions of the Act and the University's Enabling Legislation, are not affected by this Policy.

II. DEFINITIONS.

As used in this policy, the following terms shall have the following meanings, unless the context requires otherwise:

“Act” means the Restructured Higher Education Financial and Administrative Operations Act, Chapter 4.10 of Title 23 of the Code of Virginia.

“Board of Visitors” or “Board” means the Board of Visitors of Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.

“Capital Lease” means a lease that is defined as such within Generally Accepted Accounting Principles pursuant to the pronouncement of the Financial Accounting Standards Board.

“Capital Professional Services” means professional engineering, architecture, land surveying and landscape architecture services related to capital projects.

“Capital project(s)” means the acquisition of any interest in land, including improvements on the acquired land at the time of acquisition, new construction, improvements or renovations, and Capital Leases.

“Covered Institution” means, on and after the Effective Date of its initial Management Agreement, a public institution of higher education of the Commonwealth of Virginia that has entered into a management agreement with the Commonwealth to be governed by the provisions of Subchapter 3 of the Act.

“Enabling Legislation” means those chapters, other than Chapter 4.10, of Title 23 of the Code of Virginia, as amended, creating, continuing, or otherwise setting forth the powers, purposes, and missions of the individual public institutions of higher education of the Commonwealth.

“Major Capital Project(s)” means the acquisition of any interest in land, including improvements on the acquired land at the time of acquisition, new construction of 5,000 square feet or greater or costing $1 million or more, improvements or renovations of $1 million or more, and Capital Leases.

“State Tax Supported Debt” means bonds, notes, or other obligations issued under Article X, Section 9(a), 9(b), or 9(c), or 9(d), if the debt service payments are made or ultimately are to be made from general government funds, as defined in the December 20, 2004 Report to the Governor and General Assembly of the Debt Capacity Advisory Committee or as that definition is amended from time to time.

“University” means Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, consisting of the University Division (State Agency 208) and Virginia Cooperative Extension and the Agricultural Experiment Station Division (State Agency 229).

III. SCOPE OF POLICY.

This Policy applies to the planning and budget development for capital projects, capital project authorization, and the implementation of capital projects, whether funded by a general fund appropriation of the General Assembly, proceeds from State Tax Supported Debt, or funding from other sources.

This Policy provides guidance for 1) the process for developing one or more capital project programs for the University, 2) authorization of new capital projects, 3) procurement of Capital Professional Services and construction services, 4) design reviews and code approvals for capital projects, 5) environmental impact requirements, 6) building demolitions, 7) building and land acquisitions, 8) building and land dispositions, 9) project management systems, and 10) reporting requirements.

IV. BOARD OF VISITORS ACCOUNTABILITY AND DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY.

The Board of Visitors of the University shall at all times be fully and ultimately accountable for the proper fulfillment of the duties and responsibilities set forth in, and for the appropriate implementation of, this Policy. Consistent with this full and ultimate accountability, however, the Board may, pursuant to its legally permissible procedures, specifically delegate either herein or by separate Board resolution the duties and responsibilities set forth in this Policy to a person or persons within the University, who, while continuing to be fully accountable for such duties and responsibilities, may further delegate the implementation of those duties and responsibilities pursuant to the University’s usual delegation policies and procedures.

V. CAPITAL PROGRAM.

The President, acting through the Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, shall adopt a system for developing one or more capital project programs that defines or define the capital needs of the University for a given period of time consistent with the University’s published Master Plan. This process may or may not mirror the Commonwealth’s requirements for capital plans. The Board of Visitors shall approve the program for Major Capital Projects. Major Capital Projects that are to be funded entirely or in part by a general fund appropriation of the General Assembly or proceeds from State Tax Supported Debt shall follow the Commonwealth’s requirements for capital plans. The Board may approve amendments to the program for Major Capital Projects annually or more often if circumstances warrant. It shall be University policy that each capital project program shall meet the University’s mission and institutional objectives, and be appropriately authorized by the University. Moreover, it shall be University policy that each capital project shall be of a size and scope to provide for the defined program needs, designed in accordance with all applicable building codes and handicapped accessibility standards as well as the University’s design guidelines and standards, and costed to reflect current costs and escalated to the mid-point of anticipated construction.

VI. AUTHORIZATION OF CAPITAL PROJECTS.

The Board of Visitors shall authorize the initiation of each Major Capital Project by approving its size, scope, budget, and funding. The President, acting through the Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, shall adopt procedures for approving the size, scope, budget and funding of all other capital projects. Major Capital Projects that are to be funded entirely or in part by a general fund appropriation of the General Assembly or proceeds from State Tax Supported Debt, shall require both Board of Visitors approval and those preappropriation approvals of the State’s governmental agencies then applicable, and shall follow the State’s process for capital budget requests.

It shall be the policy of the University that the implementation of capital projects shall be carried out so that the capital project as completed is the capital project approved by the Board for Major Capital Projects and according to the procedures adopted by the President, acting through the Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, for all other capital projects. The President, acting through the Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, shall ensure strict adherence to this requirement. Accordingly, the budget, size and scope of a capital project shall not be materially changed beyond the plans and justifications that were the basis for the capital project's approval, either before or during construction, unless approved in advance as described above. Minor changes shall be permissible if they are determined by the President, acting through the Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, to be justified. Major Capital Projects may be submitted for Board of Visitors authorization at any time but must include a statement of urgency if not part of the approved Major Capital Project program.

VII. PROCUREMENT OF CAPITAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AND CONSTRUCTION SERVICES.

It shall be the policy of the University that procurements shall result in the purchase of high quality services and construction at reasonable prices and shall be consistent with the Policy Governing the Procurement of Goods, Services, Insurance, and Construction, and the Disposition of Surplus Materials adopted by the Board, and with the Rules Governing Procurement of Goods, Services, Insurance, and Construction, which is attached as Attachment 1 to that Policy. Specifically, the University is committed to:

A. Seeking competition to the maximum practical degree, taking into account the size of the anticipated procurement, the term of the resulting contract and the likely extent of competition;

B. Conducting all procurements in a fair and impartial manner and avoiding any impropriety or the appearance of any impropriety prohibited by State law or University policy;

C. Making procurement rules clear in advance of any competition;

D. Providing access to the University’s business to all qualified vendors, firms and contractors, with no potential bidder or offeror excluded arbitrarily or capriciously, while allowing the flexibility to engage in cooperative procurements and to meet special needs of the University;

E. Including in contracts of more than $10,000 the contractor’s agreement not to discriminate against employees or applicants because of race, religion, color, sex, national origin, age, disability or other basis prohibited by State law except where there is a bona fide occupational qualification reasonably necessary to the contractor’s normal operations; and

F. Providing for a non-discriminatory procurement process, and including appropriate and lawful provisions to effectuate fair and reasonable consideration of women-owned, minority-owned and small businesses and to promote and encourage a diversity of suppliers.

The President, acting through the Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, is authorized to develop implementing procedures for the procurement of Capital Professional Services and construction services at the University. The procedures shall implement this Policy and provide for:

A. A system of competitive negotiation for Capital Professional Services, including a procedure for expedited procurement of Capital Professional Services under $50,000, pursuant to (i) subdivisions 1, 2, and 3 a of the defined term "competitive negotiation" in Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Procurement of Goods, Services, Insurance, and Construction, and (ii) § 4-5.06 of the 2004-2006 Appropriation Act;

B. A prequalification procedure for contractors or products;

C. A procedure for special construction contracting methods, including but not limited to design-build and construction management contracts; and

D. A prompt payment procedure.

The University also may enter into cooperative arrangements with other private or public health or educational institutions, healthcare provider alliances, purchasing organizations or state agencies where, in the judgment of the University, the purposes of this Policy will be furthered.

VIII. DESIGN REVIEWS AND CODE APPROVALS.

The Board of Visitors shall review the design of all Major Capital Projects and shall provide final Major Capital Project authorization based on the size, scope and cost estimate provided with the design. Unless stipulated by the Board of Visitors at the design review, no further design reviews shall be required. For all capital projects other than Major Capital Projects, the President, acting through the Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, shall adopt procedures for design review and project authorization based on the size, scope and cost estimate provided with the design. It shall be the University’s policy that all capital projects shall be designed and constructed in accordance with applicable Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code (VUSBC) standards and the applicable accessibility code.

The President, acting through the Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, shall designate a Building Official responsible for building code compliance by either (i) hiring an individual to be the University Building Official, or (ii) continuing to use the services of the Department of General Services, Division of Engineering and Buildings, to perform the Building Official function. If option (i) is selected, the individual hired as the University Building Official shall be a full-time employee, a registered professional architect or engineer, and certified by the Department of Housing and Community Development to perform this Building Official function. The University Building Official shall issue building permits for each capital project required by the VUSBC to have a building permit, and shall determine the suitability for occupancy of, and shall issue certifications for building occupancy for, all capital projects requiring such certification. Prior to issuing any such certification, this individual shall ensure that the VUSBC and accessibility requirements are met for that capital project and that such capital project has been inspected by the State Fire Marshal or his designee as required. When serving as the University Building Official, such individual shall organizationally report directly and exclusively to the Board of Visitors. If the University hires its own University Building Official, it shall fulfill the code review requirement by maintaining a review unit of licensed professional architects or engineers ~~supported by resources and staff~~ who are certified by the Department of Housing and Community Development in accordance with § 36-137 of the Code of Virginia, for such purpose and who shall review plans, specifications and documents for compliance with building codes and standards and perform required inspections of work in progress and the completed capital project. No individual licensed professional architect or engineer hired under the University's personnel system as a member of the review unit ~~or contracted with to perform these functions~~ shall also perform other building code-related design, construction, facilities-related project management or facilities management functions for the University ~~on the same capital project~~.

IX. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORTS.

It shall be the policy of the University to assess the environmental, historic preservation, and conservation impacts of all capital projects and to minimize and otherwise mitigate all adverse impacts to the extent practicable. The University shall develop a procedure for the preparation and approval of environmental impact reports for capital projects, in accordance with State environmental, historic preservation, and conservation requirements generally applicable to capital projects otherwise meeting the definition of Major Capital Projects but, pursuant to § 23-38.109 C 1 of the Act, with a cost of $300,000 or more.

X. BUILDING DEMOLITIONS.

It shall be the policy of the University to consider the environmental and historical aspects of any proposed demolitions. The Board of Visitors shall be responsible for approving demolition requests. The University shall develop a procedure for the preparation and review of demolition requests, including any necessary reviews by the Department of Historic Resources and the Art and Architectural Review Board in accordance with State historic preservation requirements generally applicable to capital projects in the Commonwealth. Further, for any property that was acquired or constructed with funding from a general fund appropriation of the General Assembly or from proceeds from State Tax Supported Debt, general laws applicable to State owned property shall apply.

XI. BUILDING OR LAND ACQUISITIONS.

It is the policy of the University that capital projects involving building or land acquisition shall be subjected to thorough inquiry and due diligence prior to closing on the acquisition of such real property. The President, acting through the Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, shall ensure that the project management system implemented pursuant to Section XIII below provides for a review and analysis of all pertinent matters relating to the acquisition of buildings and land as any prudent purchaser would perform to the end that any building or land acquired by the University shall be suitable for its intended purpose, that the acquisition can be made without substantial risk of liability to the University and that the cost of the real property to be acquired, together with any contemplated development thereof, shall be such that compliance with the provisions of Section VI of this Policy is achieved. In addition, the President, acting through the Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, shall ensure that, where feasible and appropriate to do so, the following specific policies pertaining to the acquisition of buildings or land for capital projects are carried out.

A. Environmental and Land Use Considerations.

It is the policy of the University to reasonably cooperate with each locality affected by the acquisition. Such cooperation shall include but not be limited to furnishing any information that the locality may reasonably request and reviewing any requests by the locality with regard to any such acquisition. The University shall consider the zoning and comprehensive plan designation by the locality of the building or land and surrounding parcels, as well as any designation by State or federal agencies of historically or archeologically significant areas on the land. Nothing herein shall be construed as requiring the University to comply with local zoning laws and ordinances.

B. Infrastructure and Site Condition.

The President, acting through the Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, shall ensure that, in the case of capital projects involving the acquisition of buildings or land, the project management systems implemented under Section XIII below provide for a review of the following matters prior to acquisition of the building or land: that any land can be developed for its intended purpose without extraordinary cost; that an environmental engineer has been engaged by the University to provide an assessment of any environmental conditions on the land; that there is adequate vehicular ingress and egress to serve the contemplated use of the building or land; that utilities and other services to the land are adequate or can reasonably be provided or have been provided in the case of building acquisitions; and that the condition and grade of the soils have been examined to determine if any conditions exist that would require extraordinary site work or foundation systems.

C. Title and Survey.

A survey shall be prepared for any real property acquired, and an examination of title to the real property shall be conducted by a licensed attorney or, in the alternative, a commitment for title insurance shall be procured from a title insurance company authorized to do business in the Commonwealth. Based upon the survey and title examination or report, the President, acting through the Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, shall conclude, prior to acquisition of the real property, that title thereto will be conveyed to the University in fee simple, free and clear of all liens, encumbrances, covenants, restrictions, easements or other matters that may have a significant adverse effect upon the University's ability to own, occupy, convey or develop the real property.

D. Appraisal.

An appraisal shall be conducted of the real property to be acquired to determine its fair market value and the consistency of the fair market value with the price agreed upon by the University.

XII. BUILDING OR LAND DISPOSITIONS.

The Board of Visitors shall approve the disposition of any building or land. Disposition of land or buildings, the acquisition or construction of which was funded entirely or in part by a general fund appropriation of the General Assembly or proceeds from State Tax Supported Debt, shall require both Board of Visitors approval and other approvals in accordance with general law applicable to State-owned property and with the University’s Enabling Legislation.

XIII. PROJECT MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS.

The President, acting through the Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, shall implement one or more systems for the management of capital projects for the University. The systems may include the delegation of project management authority to appropriate University officials, including a grant of authority to such officials to engage in further delegation of authority as the President, acting through the Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, deems appropriate.

The project management systems for capital projects shall be designed to ensure that such projects comply with the provisions of this Policy and other Board of Visitors policies applicable to closely related subjects such as selection of architects or policies applicable to University buildings and grounds.

The project management systems may include one or more reporting systems applicable to capital projects whereby University officials responsible for the management of such projects provide appropriate and timely reports to the President, acting through the Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, on the status of such projects during construction.

XIV. REPORTING REQUIREMENTS.

In addition to complying with any internal reporting systems contained in the University’s project management systems, as described in Section XIII above, the University shall comply with State reporting requirements for those Major Capital Projects funded entirely or in part by a general fund appropriation by the General Assembly or State Tax Supported Debt. Additionally, if any capital project constructs improvements on land, or renovates property, that originally was acquired or constructed in whole or in part with a general fund appropriation for that purpose or proceeds from State Tax Supported Debt, and such improvements or renovations are undertaken entirely with funds not appropriated by the General Assembly and, if the cost of such improvements or renovations is reasonably expected to exceed two million dollars, the decision to undertake such improvements or renovations shall be communicated as required by § 23-38.109 C 3 of the Act. As a matter of routine, the President, acting through the Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, shall report to the Department of General Services on the status of such capital projects at the initiation of the project, prior to the commencement of construction, and at the time of acceptance of any such capital project.

ATTACHMENT 1

Rules Governing Procurement of Goods, Services, Insurance, and Construction

by a Public Institution of Higher Education of the Commonwealth of Virginia

Governed by Subchapter 3 of the

Restructured Higher Education Financial and Administrative Operations Act,

Chapter 4.10 (§ 23-38.88 et seq.) of Title 23 of the Code of Virginia

In accordance with the provisions of the Restructured Higher Education Financial and Administrative Operations Act (the Act), Chapter 4.10 (§ 23-38.88 et seq.) of Title 23 of the Code of Virginia, and in particular § 23-38.110 of the Act, the governing body of a public institution of higher education of the Commonwealth of Virginia that has entered into a Management Agreement with the Commonwealth pursuant to Subchapter 3 of the Act has adopted the following Rules Governing Procurement of Goods, Services, Insurance, and Construction to govern the procurement of goods, services, insurance, and construction by the Institution, excluding the University of Virginia Medical Center:

§ 1. Purpose. –

The purpose of these Rules is to enunciate the public policies pertaining to procurement of good, services, insurance, and construction by the Institution from nongovernmental sources, to include governmental procurement that may or may not result in monetary consideration for either party. These Rules shall apply whether the consideration is monetary or nonmonetary and regardless of whether the Institution, the contractor, or some third party is providing the consideration.

§ 2. Scope of Procurement Authority. –

Subject to these Rules, and the Institution’s continued substantial compliance with the terms and conditions of its Management Agreement with the Commonwealth pursuant to § 23-38.88(D)(4) and the requirements of Chapter 4.10 of the Act, the Institution shall have and shall be authorized to have and exercise all of the authority relating to procurement of goods, services, insurance, and construction, including but not limited to capital outlay-related procurement and information technology-related procurement, that Institutions are authorized to exercise pursuant to Subchapter 3 of the Restructuring Act.

§ 3. Competition is the Priority. –

To the end that the Institution shall obtain high quality goods and services at reasonable cost, that all procurement procedures be conducted in an open, fair and impartial manner with avoidance of any impropriety or appearance of impropriety, that all qualified vendors have access to the Institution’s business and that no offeror be arbitrarily or capriciously excluded, it is the intent of the governing body of the Institution that competition be sought to the maximum feasible degree, that procurement procedures involve openness and administrative efficiency, that individual public bodies enjoy broad flexibility in fashioning details of such competition, that the rules governing contract awards be made clear in advance of the competition, that specifications reflect the procurement needs of the purchasing body rather than being drawn to favor a particular vendor, and that the purchaser and vendor freely exchange information concerning what is sought to be procured and what is offered. The Institution may consider best value concepts when procuring goods and nonprofessional services, but not construction or professional services. Professional services will be procured using a qualification-based selection process. The criteria, factors, and basis for consideration of best value and the process for the consideration of best value shall be as stated in the procurement solicitation.

§ 4. Definitions. –

As used in these Rules:

“Affiliate” means an individual or business that controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with another individual or business. A person controls an entity if the person owns, directly or indirectly, more than 10% of the voting securities of the entity. For the purposes of this definition “voting security” means a security that (i) confers upon the holder the right to vote for the election of members of the board of directors or similar governing body of the business or (ii) is convertible into, or entitles the holder to receive, upon its exercise, a security that confers such a right to vote. A general partnership interest shall be deemed to be a voting security.

“Best value,” as predetermined in the solicitation, means the overall combination of quality, price, and various elements of required services that in total are optimal relative to the Institution’s needs.

“Business” means any type of corporation, partnership, limited liability company, association, or sole proprietorship operated for profit.

“Competitive negotiation” is a method of contractor selection that includes the following elements:

1. Issuance of a written Request for Proposal indicating in general terms that which is sought to be procured, specifying the factors that will be used in evaluating the proposal and containing or incorporating by reference the other applicable contractual terms and conditions, including any unique capabilities or qualifications that will be required of the contractor.

2. Public notice of the Request for Proposal at least 10 days prior to the date set for receipt of proposals by publication in a newspaper or newspapers of general circulation in the area in which the contract is to be performed so as to provide reasonable notice to the maximum number of offerors that can be reasonably anticipated to submit proposals in response to the particular request. Public notice also shall be published on the Department of General Services’ central electronic procurement website and may be published on other appropriate websites. In addition, proposals may be solicited directly from potential contractors.

3. a. Procurement of professional services. The procurement of professional services for capital projects shall be conducted using a qualification-based selection process. The Institution shall engage in individual discussions with two or more offerors deemed fully qualified, responsible and suitable on the basis of initial responses and with emphasis on professional competence, to provide the required services. Repetitive informal interviews shall be permissible. The offerors shall be encouraged to elaborate on their qualifications and performance data or staff expertise pertinent to the proposed project, as well as alternative concepts. The Request for Proposal shall not, however, request that offerors furnish estimates of man-hours or cost for services. At the discussion stage, the Institution may discuss nonbinding estimates of total project costs, including, but not limited to, life-cycle costing, and where appropriate, nonbinding estimates of price for services. Proprietary information from competing offerors shall not be disclosed to the public or to competitors. At the conclusion of discussion, outlined in this subdivision, on the basis of evaluation factors published in the Request for Proposal and all information developed in the selection process to this point, the Institution shall select in the order of preference two or more offerors whose professional qualifications and proposed services are deemed most meritorious. Negotiations shall then be conducted, beginning with the offeror ranked first. If a contract satisfactory and advantageous to the Institution can be negotiated at a price considered fair and reasonable, the award shall be made to that offeror. Otherwise, negotiations with the offeror ranked first shall be formally terminated and negotiations conducted with the offeror ranked second, and so on until such a contract can be negotiated at a fair and reasonable price. Should the Institution determine in writing and in its sole discretion that only one offeror is fully qualified, or that one offeror is clearly more highly qualified and suitable than the others under consideration, a contract may be negotiated and awarded to that offeror.

Multiphase professional services contracts satisfactory and advantageous to the Institution for environmental, location, design and inspection work regarding construction of infrastructure projects may be negotiated and awarded based on qualifications at a fair and reasonable price for the first phase only, when completion of the earlier phases is necessary to provide information critical to the negotiation of a fair and reasonable price for succeeding phases. Prior to the procurement of any such contract, the Institution shall state the anticipated intended total scope of the project and determine in writing that the nature of the work is such that the best interests of such Institution require awarding the contract.

b. Procurement of other than professional services. Selection shall be made of two or more offerors deemed to be fully qualified and best suited among those submitting proposals, on the basis of the factors involved in the Request for Proposal, including price if so stated in the Request for Proposal. Negotiations shall then be conducted with each of the offerors so selected. Price shall be considered, but need not be the sole determining factor. After negotiations have been conducted with each offeror so selected, the Institution shall select the offeror which, in its opinion, has made the best proposal, and shall award the contract to that offeror. When the terms and conditions of multiple awards are so provided in the Request for Proposal, awards may be made to more than one offeror. Should the Institution determine in writing and in its sole discretion that only one offeror has made the best proposal, a contract may be negotiated and awarded to that offeror.

“Competitive sealed bidding” is a method of contractor selection, other than for professional services, which includes the following elements:

1. Issuance of a written Invitation to Bid containing or incorporating by reference the specifications and contractual terms and conditions applicable to the procurement. Unless the Institution has provided for prequalification of bidders, the Invitation to Bid shall include a statement of any requisite qualifications of potential contractors. When it is impractical to prepare initially a purchase description to support an award based on prices, an Invitation to Bid may be issued requesting the submission of unpriced offers to be followed by an Invitation to Bid limited to those bidders whose offers have been qualified under the criteria set forth in the first solicitation.

2. Public notice of the Invitation to Bid at least 10 days prior to the date set for receipt of bids by publication on the Department of General Services’ central electronic procurement website. Public notice also may be published in a newspaper of general circulation or on other appropriate websites, or both. In addition, bids may be solicited directly from potential contractors. Any additional solicitations shall include businesses selected from a list made available by the Department of Minority Business Enterprise.

3. Public opening and announcement of all bids received.

4. Evaluation of bids based upon the requirements set forth in the invitation, which may include special qualifications of potential contractors, life-cycle costing, value analysis, and any other criteria such as inspection, testing, quality, workmanship, delivery, and suitability for a particular purpose, which are helpful in determining acceptability.

5. Award to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder. When the terms and conditions of multiple awards are so provided in the Invitation to Bid, awards may be made to more than one bidder.

“Construction” means building, altering, repairing, improving or demolishing any structure, building or highway, and any draining, dredging, excavation, grading or similar work upon real property.

“Construction management contract” means a contract in which a party is retained by the owner to coordinate and administer contracts for construction services for the benefit of the owner, and may also include, if provided in the contract, the furnishing of construction services to the owner.

“Covered Institution” or “Institution” means, on and after the effective date of the initial management agreement with the Commonwealth of Virginia, a public institution of higher education of the Commonwealth that has entered into a management agreement with the Commonwealth to be governed by the provisions of Subchapter 3 of the Restructuring Act. “Design-build contract” means a contract between the Institution and another party in which the party contracting with the Institution agrees to both design and build the structure, roadway or other item specified in the contract.

“Goods” means all material, equipment, supplies, and printing, including information technology and telecommunications goods such as automated data processing hardware and software. “Informality” means a minor defect or variation of a bid or proposal from the exact requirements of the Invitation to Bid, or the Request for Proposal, which does not affect the price, quality, quantity or delivery schedule for the goods, services or construction being procured. “Multiphase professional services contract” means a contract for the providing of professional services where the total scope of work of the second or subsequent phase of the contract cannot be specified without the results of the first or prior phase of the contract.

“Nonprofessional services” means any services not specifically identified as professional services in the definition of professional services and includes small construction projects valued not over $1 million; provided that subdivision 3a of the definition of “competitive negotiation” in this section shall still apply to professional services for such small construction projects.

“Potential bidder or offeror” for the purposes of §§ 50 and 54 of these Rules means a person who, at the time the Institution negotiates and awards or proposes to award a contract, is engaged in the sale or lease of goods, or the sale of services, insurance or construction, of the type to be procured under the contract, and who at such time is eligible and qualified in all respects to perform that contract, and who would have been eligible and qualified to submit a bid or proposal had the contract been procured through competitive sealed bidding or competitive negotiation.

“Professional services” means work performed by an independent contractor within the scope of the practice of accounting, actuarial services, architecture, land surveying, landscape architecture, law, dentistry, medicine, optometry, pharmacy or professional engineering.

“Public body” means any legislative, executive or judicial body, agency, office, department, authority, post, commission, committee, institution, board or political subdivision created by law to exercise some sovereign power or to perform some governmental duty, and empowered by law to undertake the activities described in these Rules.

“Public contract” means an agreement between the Institution and a nongovernmental source that is enforceable in a court of law.

“Responsible bidder” or “offeror” means a person who has the capability, in all respects, to perform fully the contract requirements and the moral and business integrity and reliability that will assure good faith performance, and who has been prequalified, if required.

“Responsive bidder” means a person who has submitted a bid that conforms in all material respects to the Invitation to Bid.

“Restructuring Act” or “Act” means the Restructured Higher Education Financial and Administrative Operations Act, Chapter 4.10 (§ 23-38.88 et seq.) of Title 23 of the Code of Virginia.

“Reverse auctioning” means a procurement method wherein bidders are invited to bid on specified goods or nonprofessional services through real-time electronic bidding, with the award being made to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder. During the bidding process, bidders’ prices are revealed and bidders shall have the opportunity to modify their bid prices for the duration of the time period established for bid opening.

“Rules” means these Rules Governing Procurement of Goods, Services, Insurance, and Construction adopted by the governing body of the Covered Institution.

“Services” means any work performed by an independent contractor wherein the service rendered does not consist primarily of acquisition of equipment or materials, or the rental of equipment, materials and supplies.

“Sheltered workshop” means a work-oriented rehabilitative facility with a controlled working environment and individual goals that utilizes work experience and related services for assisting the handicapped person to progress toward normal living and a productive vocational status.

§ 5. Methods of procurement. –

A. All public contracts with nongovernmental contractors for the purchase or lease of goods, or for the purchase of services, insurance, or construction, shall be awarded after competitive sealed bidding, or competitive negotiation as provided in this section, unless otherwise authorized by law.

B. Professional services shall be procured by competitive negotiation. Qualification-based selection shall be used for design services.

C. Goods, services, or insurance may be procured by competitive negotiation.

D. Construction may be procured only by competitive sealed bidding, except that competitive negotiation may be used in the following instances upon a determination made in advance by the Institution and set forth in writing that competitive sealed bidding is either not practicable or not fiscally advantageous to the public, which writing shall document the basis for this determination:

1. By the Institution on a fixed price design-build basis or construction management basis under § 7;

2. By the Institution for the construction, alteration, repair, renovation or demolition of buildings; or

3. By the Institution for the construction of highways and any draining, dredging, excavation, grading or similar work upon real property.

E. Upon a determination in writing that there is only one source practicably available for that which is to be procured, a contract may be negotiated and awarded to that source without competitive sealed bidding or competitive negotiation. The writing shall document the basis for this determination. The Institution shall issue a written notice stating that only one source was determined to be practicably available, and identifying that which is being procured, the contractor selected, and the date on which the contract was or will be awarded. This notice shall be posted in a designated public area, which may be the Department of General Services’ website for the Commonwealth’s central electronic procurement system, or published in a newspaper of general circulation on the day the Institution awards or announces its decision to award the contract, whichever occurs first. Public notice shall also be published on the Department of General Services' website for the Commonwealth’s central electronic procurement system and may be published on other appropriate websites.

F. In case of emergency, a contract may be awarded without competitive sealed bidding or competitive negotiation; however, such procurement shall be made with such competition as is practicable under the circumstances. A written determination of the basis for the emergency and for the selection of the particular contractor shall be included in the contract file. The Institution shall issue a written notice stating that the contract is being awarded on an emergency basis, and identifying that which is being procured, the contractor selected, and the date on which the contract was or will be awarded. This notice shall be posted in a designated public area, which may be the Department of General Services’ website for the Commonwealth’s central electronic procurement system, or published in a newspaper of general circulation on the day the Institution awards or announces its decision to award the contract, whichever occurs first, or as soon thereafter as is practicable. Public notice may also be published on the Department of General Services' website for the Commonwealth’s central electronic procurement system and other appropriate websites.

G. The Institution may establish purchase procedures, if adopted in writing, not requiring competitive sealed bids or competitive negotiation for single or term contracts for goods and services other than professional services if the aggregate or the sum of all phases is not expected to exceed $50,000; however, such small purchase procedures shall provide for competition wherever practicable.

H. The Institution may establish purchase procedures, if adopted in writing, not requiring competitive negotiation for single or term contracts for professional services if the aggregate or the sum of all phases is not expected to exceed $50,000; however such small purchase procedures shall provide for competition wherever practicable.

I. Upon a determination made in advance by the Institution and set forth in writing that the purchase of goods, products or commodities from a public auction sale is in the best interests of the public, such items may be purchased at the auction, including online public auctions. The writing shall document the basis for this determination.

J. The purchase of goods or nonprofessional services, but not construction or professional services, may be made by reverse auctioning.

§ 6. Cooperative procurement. –

A. In circumstances where the Institution determines and documents that statewide contracts for goods and services, including information technology and telecommunications goods and services, do not provide goods and services to the Institution that meet its business goals and objectives, the Institution is authorized to participate in, sponsor, conduct, or administer a cooperative procurement arrangement on behalf of or in conjunction with public bodies, public or private health or educational institutions, other public or private organizations or entities, including public-private partnerships, charitable organizations, health care provider alliances or purchasing organizations or entities, or with public agencies or institutions or group purchasing organizations of the several states, territories of the United States, or the District of Columbia, for the purpose of combining requirements to effect cost savings or reduce administrative expense in any acquisition of goods and services, other than professional services. The Institution may purchase from any authority, department, agency, institution, city, county, town, or other political subdivision of the Commonwealth's contract even if it did not participate in the request for proposal or invitation to bid, if the request for proposal or invitation to bid specified that the procurement was being conducted on behalf of other public bodies. In such instances, deviation from the procurement procedures set forth in these Rules and the administrative policies and procedures established to implement these Rules shall be permitted. Notwithstanding all of the above, use of cooperative contracts shall conform to the business requirements of the Commonwealth’s electronic procurement system, including the requirement for payment of applicable fees. Nothing herein shall prohibit the payment by direct or indirect means of any administrative fee that will allow for participation in any such arrangement.

B. In circumstances where statewide contracts for goods and services, including information technology and telecommunications goods and services, do not provide goods and services to meet the Institution’s business goals and objectives, and as authorized by the United States Congress and consistent with applicable federal regulations, and provided the terms of the contract permit such purchases:

1. The Institution may purchase goods and nonprofessional services, from a United States General Services Administration contract or a contract awarded by any other agency of the United States government; and

2. The Institution may purchase telecommunications and information technology goods and nonprofessional services from a United States General Services Administration contract or a contract awarded by any other agency of the United States government.

§ 7. Design-build or construction management contracts authorized. –

A. Notwithstanding any other provisions of law, the Institution may enter into contracts on a fixed price design-build basis or construction management basis in accordance with the provisions of this section.

B. Procurement of construction by the design-build or construction management method shall be a two-step competitive negotiation process. In the first step, offerors shall be requested to submit their qualifications. Based upon the information submitted and any other relevant information which the Commonwealth may obtain, no more than five offerors deemed most suitable for the project shall be selected by the Commonwealth and requested to submit proposals.

§ 8. Modification of the contract. –

A. A contract awarded by the Institution may include provisions for modification of the contract during performance, but no fixed-price contract may be increased by more than 25% of the amount of the contract or $50,000, whichever is greater, without the advance written approval of the Institution’s president or his designee. In no event may the amount of any contract, without adequate consideration, be increased for any purpose, including, but not limited to, relief of an offeror from the consequences of an error in its bid or offer.

B. The Institution may extend the term of an existing contract for services to allow completion of any work undertaken but not completed during the original term of the contract.

C. Nothing in this section shall prevent the Institution from placing greater restrictions on contract modifications.

§ 9. Discrimination prohibited; participation of small, women- and minority-owned business. –

A. In the solicitation or awarding of contracts, the Institution shall not discriminate against a bidder or offeror because of race, religion, color, sex, national origin, age, disability, or any other basis prohibited by state law relating to discrimination in employment. Whenever solicitations are made, the Institution shall include businesses selected from a list made available by the Department of Minority Business Enterprise.

B. The Institution shall establish programs consistent with this section to facilitate the participation of small businesses and businesses owned by women and minorities in procurement transactions. The programs established shall be in writing and shall include cooperation with the Department of Minority Business Enterprise, the United States Small Business Administration, and other public or private agencies. The Institution shall submit annual progress reports on minority business procurement to the Department of Minority Business Enterprise.

C. Whenever there exists (i) a rational basis for small business enhancement or (ii) a persuasive analysis that documents a statistically significant disparity between the availability and utilization of women- and minority-owned businesses, the Governor is by law authorized and encouraged to require the Institution to implement appropriate enhancement or remedial measures consistent with prevailing law.

D. In the solicitation or awarding of contracts, the Institution shall not discriminate against a bidder or offeror because the bidder or offeror employs ex-offenders unless it has made a written determination that employing ex-offenders on the specific contract is not in its best interest.

§ 10. Employment discrimination by contractor prohibited; required contract provisions. –

The Institution shall include in every contract of more than $10,000 the following provisions:

1. During the performance of this contract, the contractor agrees as follows:

a. The contractor will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, religion, color, sex, national origin, age, disability, or other basis prohibited by state law relating to discrimination in employment, except where there is a bona fide occupational qualification reasonably necessary to the normal operation of the contractor. The contractor agrees to post in conspicuous places, available to employees and applicants for employment, notices setting forth the provisions of this nondiscrimination clause.

b. The contractor, in all solicitations or advertisements for employees placed by or on behalf of the contractor, will state that such contractor is an equal opportunity employer.

c. Notices, advertisements and solicitations placed in accordance with federal law, rule or regulation shall be deemed sufficient for the purpose of meeting the requirements of this section.

2. The contractor will include the provisions of the foregoing paragraphs a, b, and c in every subcontract or purchase order of over $10,000, so that the provisions will be binding upon each subcontractor or vendor.

§ 11. Drug-free workplace to be maintained by contractor; required contract provisions. –

The Institution shall include in every contract over $10,000 the following provisions: During the performance of this contract, the contractor agrees to (i) provide a drug-free workplace for the contractor's employees; (ii) post in conspicuous places, available to employees and applicants for employment, a statement notifying employees that the unlawful manufacture, sale, distribution, dispensation, possession, or use of a controlled substance or marijuana is prohibited in the contractor's workplace and specifying the actions that will be taken against employees for violations of such prohibition; (iii) state in all solicitations or advertisements for employees placed by or on behalf of the contractor that the contractor maintains a drug-free workplace; and (iv) include the provisions of the foregoing clauses in every subcontract or purchase order of over $10,000, so that the provisions will be binding upon each subcontractor or vendor.

For the purposes of this section, "drug-free workplace" means a site for the ”performance of work done in connection with a specific contract awarded to a contractor in accordance with these Rules, the employees of whom are prohibited from engaging in the unlawful manufacture, sale, distribution, dispensation, possession or use of any controlled substance or marijuana during the performance of the contract.

§ 12. Use of brand names. –

Unless otherwise provided in the Invitation to Bid, the name of a certain brand, make or manufacturer shall not restrict bidders to the specific brand, make or manufacturer named and shall be deemed to convey the general style, type, character, and quality of the article desired. Any article that the Institution in its sole discretion determines to be the equal of that specified, considering quality, workmanship, economy of operation, and suitability for the purpose intended, shall be accepted.

§ 13. Comments concerning specifications. –

The Institution shall establish procedures whereby comments concerning specifications or other provisions in Invitations to Bid or Requests for Proposal can be received and considered prior to the time set for receipt of bids or proposals or award of the contract.

§ 14. Prequalification generally; prequalification for construction. –

A. Prospective contractors may be prequalified for particular types of supplies, services, insurance or construction, and consideration of bids or proposals limited to prequalified contractors. Any prequalification procedure shall be established in writing and sufficiently in advance of its implementation to allow potential contractors a fair opportunity to complete the process.

B. Any prequalification of prospective contractors for construction by the Institution shall be pursuant to a prequalification process for construction projects adopted by the Institution. The process shall be consistent with the provisions of this section.

The application form used in such process shall set forth the criteria upon which the qualifications of prospective contractors will be evaluated. The application form shall request of prospective contractors only such information as is appropriate for an objective evaluation of all prospective contractors pursuant to such criteria. The form shall allow the prospective contractor seeking prequalification to request, by checking the appropriate box, that all information voluntarily submitted by the contractor pursuant to this subsection shall be considered a trade secret or proprietary information subject to the provisions of subsection D of § 34 of these Rules.

In all instances in which the Institution requires prequalification of potential contractors for construction projects, advance notice shall be given of the deadline for the submission of prequalification applications. The deadline for submission shall be sufficiently in advance of the date set for the submission of bids for such construction so as to allow the procedures set forth in this subsection to be accomplished.

At least 30 days prior to the date established for submission of bids or proposals under the procurement of the contract for which the prequalification applies, the Institution shall advise in writing each contractor who submitted an application whether that contractor has been prequalified. In the event that a contractor is denied prequalification, the written notification to the contractor shall state the reasons for the denial of prequalification and the factual basis of such reasons.

A decision by the Institution denying prequalification under the provisions of this subsection shall be final and conclusive unless the contractor appeals the decision as provided in § 54 of these Rules.

C. The Institution may deny prequalification to any contractor only if the Institution finds one of the following:

1. The contractor does not have sufficient financial ability to perform the contract that would result from such procurement. If a bond is required to ensure performance of a contract, evidence that the contractor can acquire a surety bond from a corporation included on the United States Treasury list of acceptable surety corporations in the amount and type required by the Institution shall be sufficient to establish the financial ability of the contractor to perform the contract resulting from such procurement;

2. The contractor does not have appropriate experience to perform the construction project in question;

3. The contractor or any officer, director or owner thereof has had judgments entered against him within the past 10 years for the breach of contracts for governmental or nongovernmental construction, including, but not limited to, design-build or construction management;

The Institution may not utilize this provision to deny prequalification unless the facts underlying such substantial noncompliance were documented in writing in the prior construction project file and such information relating thereto given to the contractor at that time, with the opportunity to respond;

5. The contractor or any officer, director, owner, project manager, procurement manager or chief financial official thereof has been convicted within the past 10 years of a crime related to governmental or nongovernmental construction or contracting, including, but not limited to, a violation of (i) Article 6 (§ 2.2-4367 et seq.) of Chapter 43 of Title 2.2 of the Code of Virginia, (ii) the Virginia Governmental Frauds Act (§ 18.2-498.1 et seq.), (iii) Chapter 4.2 (§ 59.1-68.6 et seq.) of Title 59.1 of the Code of Virginia, or (iv) any substantially similar law of the United States or another state;

6. The contractor or any officer, director or owner thereof is currently debarred pursuant to an established debarment procedure from bidding or contracting by any public body, agency of another state or agency of the federal government; and

7. The contractor failed to provide to the Institution in a timely manner any information requested by the Institution relevant to subdivisions 1 through 6 of this subsection.

§ 15. Negotiation with lowest responsible bidder. –

Unless canceled or rejected, a responsive bid from the lowest responsible bidder shall be accepted as submitted, except that if the bid from the lowest responsible bidder exceeds available funds, the Institution may negotiate with the apparent low bidder to obtain a contract price within available funds. However, the negotiation may be undertaken only under conditions and procedures described in writing and approved by the Institution prior to issuance of the Invitation to Bid and summarized therein.

§ 16. Cancellation, rejection of bids; waiver of informalities. –

A. An Invitation to Bid, a Request for Proposal, any other solicitation, or any and all bids or proposals, may be canceled or rejected. The reasons for cancellation or rejection shall be made part of the contract file. The Institution shall not cancel or reject an Invitation to Bid, a Request for Proposal, any other solicitation, bid or proposal pursuant to this section solely to avoid awarding a contract to a particular responsive and responsible bidder or offeror.

B. The Institution may waive informalities in bids.

§ 17. Exclusion of insurance bids prohibited. –

Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no insurer licensed to transact the business of insurance in the Commonwealth or approved to issue surplus lines insurance in the Commonwealth shall be excluded from presenting an insurance bid proposal to the Institution in response to a request for proposal or an invitation to bid. Nothing in this section shall preclude the Institution from debarring a prospective insurer pursuant to § 18.

§ 18. Debarment. –

Prospective contractors may be debarred from contracting for particular types of supplies, services, insurance or construction, for specified periods of time. Any debarment procedure shall be established in writing by the Institution. Any debarment procedure may provide for debarment on the basis of a contractor’s unsatisfactory performance for the Institution.

§ 19. Purchase programs for recycled goods; Institution responsibilities. –

A. The Institution may implement a purchase program for recycled goods and may coordinate its efforts so as to achieve the goals and objectives set forth in §§ 10.1-1425.6, 10.1-1425.7, and 10.1-1425.8 of the Code of Virginia, and §§ 20 and 22 of these Rules.

B. The Department of Environmental Quality, with advice from the Virginia Recycling Markets Development Council, shall advise the Institution concerning the designation of recycled goods.

§ 20. Preference for Virginia products with recycled content and for Virginia firms. –

A. In the case of a tie bid, preference shall be given to goods produced in Virginia, goods or services or construction provided by Virginia persons, firms or corporations; otherwise the tie shall be decided by lot.

B. Whenever any bidder is a resident of any other state and such state under its laws allows a resident contractor of that state a preference, a like preference may be allowed by the Institution to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder who is a resident of Virginia.

C. Notwithstanding the provisions of subsections A and B, in the case of a tie bid in instances where goods are being offered, and existing price preferences have already been taken into account, preference shall be given to the bidder whose goods contain the greatest amount of recycled content.

§ 21. Preference for Virginia coal used in the Institution. –

In determining the award of any contract for coal to be purchased for use in the Institution with state funds, the Institution shall procure using competitive sealed bidding and shall award to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder offering coal mined in Virginia so long as its bid price is not more than 4% greater than the bid price of the low responsive and responsible bidder offering coal mined elsewhere.

§ 22. Preference for recycled paper and paper products used by the Institution. –

A. In determining the award of any contract for paper and paper products to be purchased for use by the Institution, it shall competitively procure recycled paper and paper products of a quality suitable for the purpose intended, so long as the price is not more than 10% greater than the price of the low responsive and responsible bidder or offeror offering a product that does not qualify under subsection B.

B. For purposes of this section, recycled paper and paper products means any paper or paper products meeting the EPA Recommended Content Standards as defined in 40 C.F.R. Part 247.

§ 23. Withdrawal of bid due to error. –

A. A bidder for a public construction contract, other than a contract for construction or maintenance of public highways, may withdraw his bid from consideration if the price bid was substantially lower than the other bids due solely to a mistake in the bid, provided the bid was submitted in good faith, and the mistake was a clerical mistake as opposed to a judgment mistake, and was actually due to an unintentional arithmetic error or an unintentional omission of a quantity of work, labor or material made directly in the compilation of a bid, which unintentional arithmetic error or unintentional omission can be clearly shown by objective evidence drawn from inspection of original work papers, documents and materials used in the preparation of the bid sought to be withdrawn.

If a bid contains both clerical and judgment mistakes, a bidder may withdraw his bid from consideration if the price bid would have been substantially lower than the other bids due solely to the clerical mistake, that was an unintentional arithmetic error or an unintentional omission of a quantity of work, labor or material made directly in the compilation of a bid that shall be clearly shown by objective evidence drawn from inspection of original work papers, documents and materials used in the preparation of the bid sought to be withdrawn.

One of the following procedures for withdrawal of a bid shall be selected by the Institution and stated in the advertisement for bids: (i) the bidder shall give notice in writing of his claim of right to withdraw his bid within two business days after the conclusion of the bid opening procedure and shall submit original work papers with such notice; or (ii) the bidder shall submit to the Institution or designated official his original work papers, documents and materials used in the preparation of the bid within one day after the date fixed for submission of bids. The work papers shall be delivered by the bidder in person or by registered mail at or prior to the time fixed for the opening of bids. In either instance, the work papers, documents and materials may be considered as trade secrets or proprietary information subject to the conditions of subsection F of § 34 of these Rules. The bids shall be opened one day following the time fixed by the Institution for the submission of bids. Thereafter, the bidder shall have two hours after the opening of bids within which to claim in writing any mistake as defined herein and withdraw his bid. The contract shall not be awarded by the Institution until the two-hour period has elapsed. The mistake shall be proved only from the original work papers, documents and materials delivered as required herein.

B. The Institution may establish procedures for the withdrawal of bids for other than construction contracts.

C. No bid shall be withdrawn under this section when the result would be the awarding of the contract on another bid of the same bidder or of another bidder in which the ownership of the withdrawing bidder is more than 5%.

D. If a bid is withdrawn in accordance with this section, the lowest remaining bid shall be deemed to be the low bid.

E. No bidder who is permitted to withdraw a bid shall, for compensation, supply any material or labor to or perform any subcontract or other work agreement for the person or firm to whom the contract is awarded or otherwise benefit, directly or indirectly, from the performance of the project for which the withdrawn bid was submitted.

F. If the Institution denies the withdrawal of a bid under the provisions of this section, it shall notify the bidder in writing stating the reasons for its decision and award the contract to such bidder at the bid price, provided such bidder is a responsible and responsive bidder.

§ 24. Contract Pricing Arrangements. –

A. Public contracts may be awarded on a fixed price or cost reimbursement basis, or on any other basis that is not prohibited by these Rules.

B. Except in case of emergency affecting the public health, safety or welfare, no public contract shall be awarded on the basis of cost plus a percentage of cost.

C. A policy or contract of insurance or prepaid coverage having a premium computed on the basis of claims paid or incurred, plus the insurance carrier’s administrative costs and retention stated in whole or part as a percentage of such claims, shall not be prohibited by this section.

§ 25. Workers' compensation requirements for construction contractors and subcontractors. –

A. No contractor shall perform any work on a construction project of the Institution unless he (i) has obtained, and continues to maintain for the duration of the work, workers' compensation coverage required pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 8 (§ 65.2-800 et seq.) of Title 65.2 of the code of Virginia, and (ii) provides prior to the award of contract, on a form furnished by the Institution, evidence of such coverage.

B. The Department of General Services shall provide the form to the Institution. Failure of the Institution to provide the form prior to the award of contract shall waive the requirements of clause (ii) of subsection A.

C. No subcontractor shall perform any work on a construction project of the Institution unless he has obtained, and continues to maintain for the duration of such work, workers' compensation coverage required pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 8 (§ 65.2-800 et seq.) of Title 65.2 of the Code of Virginia.

§ 26. Retainage on construction contracts. –

A. In any contract issued by the Institution for construction that provides for progress payments in installments based upon an estimated percentage of completion, the contractor shall be paid at least 95% of the earned sum when payment is due, with no more than 5% being retained to ensure faithful performance of the contract. All amounts withheld may be included in the final payment.

B. Any subcontract for a public project that provides for similar progress payments shall be subject to the provisions of this section.

§ 27. Public construction contract provisions barring damages for unreasonable delays declared void. –

A. Any provision contained in any public construction contract of the Institution that purports to waive, release, or extinguish the rights of a contractor to recover costs or damages for unreasonable delay in performing such contract, either on his behalf or on behalf of his subcontractor if and to the extent the delay is caused by acts or omissions of the Institution, its agents or employees and due to causes within their control shall be void and unenforceable as against public policy.

B. Subsection A shall not be construed to render void any provision of a public construction contract awarded by the Institution that:

1. Allows the recovery of that portion of delay costs caused by the acts or omissions of the contractor, or its subcontractors, agents or employees;

2. Requires notice of any delay by the party claiming the delay;

3. Provides for liquidated damages for delay; or

4. Provides for arbitration or any other procedure designed to settle contract disputes.

C. A contractor making a claim against the Institution for costs or damages due to the alleged delaying of the contractor in the performance of its work under any public construction contract of the Institution shall be liable to the Institution and shall pay it for a percentage of all costs incurred by the Institution in investigating, analyzing, negotiating, litigating and arbitrating the claim, which percentage shall be equal to the percentage of the contractor's total delay claim that is determined through litigation or arbitration to be false or to have no basis in law or in fact.

D. If the Institution denies a contractor's claim for costs or damages due to the alleged delaying of the contractor in the performance of work under any public construction contract for the Institution, it shall be liable to and shall pay such contractor a percentage of all costs incurred by the contractor to investigate, analyze, negotiate, litigate and arbitrate the claim. The percentage paid by the Institution shall be equal to the percentage of the contractor's total delay claim for which the Institution's denial is determined through litigation or arbitration to have been made in bad faith.

§ 28. Bid bonds. –

A. Except in cases of emergency, all bids or proposals for construction contracts in excess of $1 million shall be accompanied by a bid bond from a surety company selected by the bidder that is authorized to do business in Virginia, as a guarantee that if the contract is awarded to the bidder, he will enter into the contract for the work mentioned in the bid. The amount of the bid bond shall not exceed 5% of the amount bid.

B. No forfeiture under a bid bond shall exceed the lesser of (i) the difference between the bid for which the bond was written and the next low bid, or (ii) the face amount of the bid bond.

C. Nothing in this section shall preclude the Institution from requiring bid bonds to accompany bids or proposals for construction contracts anticipated to be less than $1 million.

§ 29. Performance and payment bonds. –

A. Upon the award by the Institution of any (i) public construction contract exceeding $1 million awarded to any prime contractor or (ii) public construction contract exceeding $1 million awarded to any prime contractor requiring the performance of labor or the furnishing of materials for buildings, structures or other improvements to real property owned by the Institution, the contractor shall furnish to the Institution the following bonds:

1. Except for transportation-related projects, a performance bond in the sum of the contract amount conditioned upon the faithful performance of the contract in strict conformity with the plans, specifications and conditions of the contract. For transportation-related projects, such bond shall be in a form and amount satisfactory to the Institution.

2. A payment bond in the sum of the contract amount. The bond shall be for the protection of claimants who have and fulfill contracts to supply labor or materials to the prime contractor to whom the contract was awarded, or to any subcontractors, in furtherance of the work provided for in the contract, and shall be conditioned upon the prompt payment for all materials furnished or labor supplied or performed in the furtherance of the work.

"Labor or materials" shall include public utility services and reasonable rentals of equipment, but only for periods when the equipment rented is actually used at the site.

B. Each of the bonds shall be executed by one or more surety companies selected by the contractor that are authorized to do business in Virginia.

C. The bonds shall be payable to the Commonwealth of Virginia naming also the Institution.

D. Each of the bonds shall be filed with the Institution, or a designated office or official thereof.

E. Nothing in this section shall preclude the Institution from requiring payment or performance bonds for construction contracts below $1 million.

F. Nothing in this section shall preclude the contractor from requiring each subcontractor to furnish a payment bond with surety thereon in the sum of the full amount of the contract with such subcontractor conditioned upon the payment to all persons who have and fulfill contracts that are directly with the subcontractor for performing labor and furnishing materials in the prosecution of the work provided for in the subcontract.

§ 30. Alternative forms of security. –

A. In lieu of a bid, payment, or performance bond, a bidder may furnish a certified check or cash escrow in the face amount required for the bond.

B. If approved by the Institution’s General Counsel or his equivalent, a bidder may furnish to the Institution a personal bond, property bond, or bank or savings institution's letter of credit on certain designated funds in the face amount required for the bid, payment or performance bond. Approval shall be granted only upon a determination that the alternative form of security proffered affords protection to the Institution equivalent to a corporate surety's bond.

§ 31. Bonds on other than construction contracts. –

The Institution may require bid, payment, or performance bonds for contracts for goods or services if provided in the Invitation to Bid or Request for Proposal.

§ 32. Action on performance bond. –

No action against the surety on a performance bond shall be brought by the Institution unless brought within one year after (i) completion of the contract, including the expiration of all warranties and guarantees, or (ii) discovery of the defect or breach of warranty that gave rise to the action.

§ 33. Actions on payment bonds; waiver of right to sue. –

A. Subject to the provisions of subsection B, any claimant who has performed labor or furnished material in accordance with the contract documents in furtherance of the work provided in any contract for which a payment bond has been given, and who has not been paid in full before the expiration of 90 days after the day on which the claimant performed the last of the labor or furnished the last of the materials for which he claims payment, may bring an action on the payment bond to recover any amount due him for the labor or material. The obligee named in the bond need not be named a party to the action.

B. Any claimant who has a direct contractual relationship with any subcontractor but who has no contractual relationship, express or implied, with the contractor, may bring an action on the contractor's payment bond only if he has given written notice to the contractor within 180 days from the day on which the claimant performed the last of the labor or furnished the last of the materials for which he claims payment, stating with substantial accuracy the amount claimed and the name of the person for whom the work was performed or to whom the material was furnished. Notice to the contractor shall be served by registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, in an envelope addressed to such contractor at any place where his office is regularly maintained for the transaction of business. Claims for sums withheld as retainages with respect to labor performed or materials furnished, shall not be subject to the time limitations stated in this subsection.

C. Any action on a payment bond shall be brought within one year after the day on which the person bringing such action last performed labor or last furnished or supplied materials.

D. Any waiver of the right to sue on the payment bond required by this section shall be void unless it is in writing, signed by the person whose right is waived, and executed after such person has performed labor or furnished material in accordance with the contract documents.

§ 34. Public inspection of certain records. –

A. Except as provided in this section, all proceedings, records, contracts and other public records relating to procurement transactions shall be open to the inspection of any citizen, or any interested person, firm or corporation, in accordance with the Virginia Freedom of Information Act (§ 2.2-3700 et seq.).

B. Cost estimates relating to a proposed procurement transaction prepared by or for the Institution shall not be open to public inspection.

C. Any competitive sealed bidding bidder, upon request, shall be afforded the opportunity to inspect bid records within a reasonable time after the opening of all bids but prior to award, except in the event that the Institution decides not to accept any of the bids and to reopen the contract. Otherwise, bid records shall be open to public inspection only after award of the contract.

D. Any competitive negotiation offeror, upon request, shall be afforded the opportunity to inspect proposal records within a reasonable time after the evaluation and negotiations of proposals are completed but prior to award, except in the event that the Institution decides not to accept any of the proposals and to reopen the contract. Otherwise, proposal records shall be open to public inspection only after award of the contract.

E. Any inspection of procurement transaction records under this section shall be subject to reasonable restrictions to ensure the security and integrity of the records.

F. Trade secrets or proprietary information submitted by a bidder, offeror or contractor in connection with a procurement transaction or prequalification application submitted pursuant to subsection B of § 14 shall not be subject to the Virginia Freedom of Information Act (§ 2.2-3700 et seq.); however, the bidder, offeror or contractor shall (i) invoke the protections of this section prior to or upon submission of the data or other materials, (ii) identify the data or other materials to be protected, and (iii) state the reasons why protection is necessary.

§ 35. Exemption for certain transactions. –

A. The provisions of these Rules shall not apply to:

1. The selection of services related to the management and investment of the Institution’s endowment funds, endowment income, or gifts pursuant to § 23-76.1. However, selection of these services shall be governed by the Uniform Management of Institutional Funds Act (§ 55-268.1 et seq.) as required by § 23-76.1.

2. The purchase of items for resale at retail bookstores and similar retail outlets operated by the Institution. However, such purchase procedures shall provide for competition where practicable.

3. Procurement of any construction or planning and design services for construction by the Institution when (i) the planning, design or construction is $50,000 or less or (ii) the Institution is obligated to conform to procurement procedures that are established by federal statutes or regulations, whether or not those federal procedures are in conformance with the provisions of these Rules.

4. The University of Virginia Medical Center.

5. The purchase of goods and services by the Institution when such purchases are made under a remedial plan established by the Governor pursuant to subsection C of § 9 of these Rules.

B. Where a procurement transaction involves the expenditure of federal assistance or contract funds, the receipt of which is conditioned upon compliance with mandatory requirements in federal laws or regulations not in conformance with the provisions of these Rules, the Institution may comply with such federal requirements, notwithstanding the provisions of these Rules, only upon the written determination of the Institution’s President or his designee that acceptance of the grant or contract funds under the applicable conditions is in the public interest. Such determination shall state the specific provision of these Rules in conflict with the conditions of the grant or contract.

§ 36. Permitted contracts with certain religious organizations; purpose; limitations. –

A. The Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996, P.L. 104-193, authorizes public bodies to enter into contracts with faith-based organizations for the purposes described in this section on the same basis as any other nongovernmental source without impairing the religious character of such organization, and without diminishing the religious freedom of the beneficiaries of assistance provided under this section.

B. For the purposes of this section, "faith-based organization" means a religious organization that is or applies to be a contractor to provide goods or services for programs funded by the block grant provided pursuant to the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996, P.L. 104-193.

C. The Institution, in procuring goods or services, or in making disbursements pursuant to this section, shall not (i) discriminate against a faith-based organization on the basis of the organization's religious character or (ii) impose conditions that (a) restrict the religious character of the faith-based organization, except as provided in subsection F, or (b) impair, diminish, or discourage the exercise of religious freedom by the recipients of such goods, services, or disbursements.

D. The Institution shall ensure that all invitations to bid, requests for proposals, contracts, and purchase orders prominently display a nondiscrimination statement indicating that it does not discriminate against faith-based organizations.

E. A faith-based organization contracting with the Institution (i) shall not discriminate against any recipient of goods, services, or disbursements made pursuant to a contract authorized by this section on the basis of the recipient's religion, religious belief, refusal to participate in a religious practice, or on the basis of race, age, color, gender or national origin and (ii) shall be subject to the same rules as other organizations that contract with public bodies to account for the use of the funds provided; however, if the faith-based organization segregates public funds into separate accounts, only the accounts and programs funded with public funds shall be subject to audit by the Institution. Nothing in clause (ii) shall be construed to supersede or otherwise override any other applicable state law.

F. Consistent with the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996, P.L. 104-193, funds provided for expenditure pursuant to contracts with public bodies shall not be spent for sectarian worship, instruction, or proselytizing; however, this prohibition shall not apply to expenditures pursuant to contracts, if any, for the services of chaplains.

G. Nothing in this section shall be construed as barring or prohibiting a faith-based organization from any opportunity to make a bid or proposal or contract on the grounds that the faith-based organization has exercised the right, as expressed in 42 U.S.C. (§ 2000e-1 et seq.), to employ persons of a particular religion.

H. If an individual, who applies for or receives goods, services, or disbursements provided pursuant to a contract between the Institution and a faith-based organization, objects to the religious character of the faith-based organization from which the individual receives or would receive the goods, services, or disbursements, the Institution shall offer the individual, within a reasonable period of time after the date of his objection, access to equivalent goods, services, or disbursements from an alternative provider.

The Institution shall provide to each individual who applies for or receives goods, services, or disbursements provided pursuant to a contract between the Institution and a faith-based organization a notice in bold face type that states: "Neither the Institution's selection of a charitable or faith-based provider of services nor the expenditure of funds under this contract is an endorsement of the provider's charitable or religious character, practices, or expression. No provider of services may discriminate against you on the basis of religion, a religious belief, or your refusal to actively participate in a religious practice. If you object to a particular provider because of its religious character, you may request assignment to a different provider. If you believe that your rights have been violated, please discuss the complaint with your provider or notify the appropriate person as indicated in this form."

§ 37. Exemptions from competition for certain transactions. –

The Institution may enter into contracts without competition, as that term is described in subsections A through J of § 5 (Methods of procurement) of these Rules, for:

1. The purchase of goods or services that are produced or performed by or related to:

a. Persons, or in schools or workshops, under the supervision of the Virginia Department for the Blind and Vision Impaired;

b. Nonprofit sheltered workshops or other nonprofit organizations that offer transitional or supported employment services serving the handicapped;

c. Private educational institutions; or

d. Other public educational institutions.

2. Speakers and performing artists;

3. Memberships and Association dues;

4. Sponsored research grant sub-awards and contract sub-awards, not to include the purchase of goods or services by the Institution;

5. Group travel in foreign countries;

6. Conference facilities and services;

7. Participation in intercollegiate athletic tournaments and events including team travel and lodging, registration and tournament fees;

8. Royalties; or

9. The purchase of legal services, provided that the Office of the Attorney General has been consulted, or expert witnesses or other services associated with litigation or regulatory proceedings; or

10. Maintenance contract renewals for scientific research equipment and software, provided that the Institution has posted the renewal to eVA and documented that there was only one response or less and such documentation includes a statement signed by the buyer indicating that no firm other than the original manufacturer/developer offers the service.

§ 38. Exemptions from competitive sealed bidding and competitive negotiation for certain transactions; limitations. –

The Institution may enter into contracts for insurance or electric utility service without competitive sealed bidding or competitive negotiation if purchased through an association of which the Institution is a member if the association was formed and is maintained for the purpose of promoting the interest and welfare of and developing close relationships with similar public bodies, provided such association has procured the insurance or electric utility services by use of competitive principles and provided that the Institution has made a determination in advance after reasonable notice to the public and set forth in writing that competitive sealed bidding and competitive negotiation are not fiscally advantageous to the public. The writing shall document the basis for this determination.

§ 39. Definitions. –

As used in §§ 39 through 46, unless the context requires a different meaning:

"Contractor" means the entity that has a direct contract with the Institution.

"Debtor" means any individual, business, or group having a delinquent debt or account with any state agency that obligation has not been satisfied or set aside by court order or discharged in bankruptcy.

"Payment date" means either (i) the date on which payment is due under the terms of a contract for provision of goods or services; or (ii) if such date has not been established by contract, (a) 30 days after receipt of a proper invoice by the Institution or its agent or (b) 30 days after receipt of the goods or services by the Institution.

"Subcontractor" means any entity that has a contract to supply labor or materials to the contractor to whom the contract was awarded or to any subcontractor in the performance of the work provided for in such contract.

§ 40. Exemptions. –

The provisions of §§ 39 through 46 shall not apply to the late payment provisions contained in any public utility tariffs prescribed by the State Corporation Commission.

§ 41. Retainage to remain valid. –

Notwithstanding the provisions of §§ 39 through 46, the provisions of § 26 relating to retainage shall remain valid.

§ 42. Prompt payment of bills by the Institution. –

A. The Institution shall promptly pay for the completely delivered goods or services by the required payment date.

Payment shall be deemed to have been made when offset proceedings have been instituted, as authorized under the Virginia Debt Collection Act (§ 2.2-4800 et seq.) of the Code of Virginia.

B. Separate payment dates may be specified for contracts under which goods or services are provided in a series of partial deliveries or executions to the extent that such contract provides for separate payment for such partial delivery or execution.

§ 43. Defect or impropriety in the invoice or goods and/or services received. –

In instances where there is a defect or impropriety in an invoice or in the goods or services received, the Institution shall notify the supplier of the defect or impropriety, if the defect or impropriety would prevent payment by the payment date. The notice shall be sent within 15 days after receipt of the invoice or the goods or services.

§ 44. Date of postmark deemed to be date payment is made. –

In those cases where payment is made by mail, the date of postmark shall be deemed to be the date payment is made for purposes of these Rules.

§ 45. Payment clauses to be included in contracts. –

Any contract awarded by the Institution shall include:

1. A payment clause that obligates the contractor to take one of the two following actions within seven days after receipt of amounts paid to the contractor by the Institution for work performed by the subcontractor under that contract:

a. Pay the subcontractor for the proportionate share of the total payment received from the Institution attributable to the work performed by the subcontractor under that contract; or

b. Notify the Institution and subcontractor, in writing, of his intention to withhold all or a part of the subcontractor's payment with the reason for nonpayment.

2. A payment clause that requires (i) individual contractors to provide their social security numbers and (ii) proprietorships, partnerships, and corporations to provide their federal employer identification numbers.

3. An interest clause that obligates the contractor to pay interest to the subcontractor on all amounts owed by the contractor that remain unpaid after seven days following receipt by the contractor of payment from the Institution for work performed by the subcontractor under that contract, except for amounts withheld as allowed in subdivision 1.

4. An interest rate clause stating, "Unless otherwise provided under the terms of this contract, interest shall accrue at the rate of 1% per month."

Any such contract awarded shall further require the contractor to include in each of its subcontracts a provision requiring each subcontractor to include or otherwise be subject to the same payment and interest requirements with respect to each lower-tier subcontractor.

A contractor's obligation to pay an interest charge to a subcontractor pursuant to the payment clause in this section shall not be construed to be an obligation of the Institution. A contract modification shall not be made for the purpose of providing reimbursement for the interest charge. A cost reimbursement claim shall not include any amount for reimbursement for the interest charge.

§ 46. Interest penalty; exceptions. –

A. Interest shall accrue, at the rate determined pursuant to subsection B, on all amounts owed by the Institution to a vendor that remain unpaid after seven days following the payment date. However, nothing in this section shall affect any contract providing for a different rate of interest, or for the payment of interest in a different manner.

B. The rate of interest charged the Institution pursuant to subsection A shall be the base rate on corporate loans (prime rate) at large United States money center commercial banks as reported daily in the publication entitled The Wall Street Journal. Whenever a split prime rate is published, the lower of the two rates shall be used. However, in no event shall the rate of interest charged exceed the rate of interest established pursuant to § 58.1-1812 of the Code of Virginia.

C. Notwithstanding subsection A, no interest penalty shall be charged when payment is delayed because of disagreement between the Institution and a vendor regarding the quantity, quality or time of delivery of goods or services or the accuracy of any invoice received for the goods or services. The exception from the interest penalty provided by this subsection shall apply only to that portion of a delayed payment that is actually the subject of the disagreement and shall apply only for the duration of the disagreement.

D. This section shall not apply to § 26 pertaining to retainage on construction contracts, during the period of time prior to the date the final payment is due. Nothing contained herein shall prevent a contractor from receiving interest on such funds under an approved escrow agreement.

E. Notwithstanding subsection A, no interest penalty shall be paid to any debtor on any payment, or portion thereof, withheld pursuant to the Comptroller's Debt Setoff Program, as authorized by the Virginia Debt Collection Act (§ 2.2-4800 et seq.) of the Code of Virginia), commencing with the date the payment is withheld. If, as a result of an error, a payment or portion thereof is withheld, and it is determined that at the time of setoff no debt was owed to the Commonwealth, then interest shall accrue at the rate determined pursuant to subsection B on amounts withheld that remain unpaid after seven days following the payment date.

§ 47. Ineligibility. –

A. Any bidder, offeror or contractor refused permission to participate, or disqualified from participation, in public contracts to be issued by the Institution shall be notified in writing. Prior to the issuance of a written determination of disqualification or ineligibility, the Institution shall (i) notify the bidder in writing of the results of the evaluation, (ii) disclose the factual support for the determination, and (iii) allow the bidder an opportunity to inspect any documents that relate to the determination, if so requested by the bidder within five business days after receipt of the notice.

Within 10 business days after receipt of the notice, the bidder may submit rebuttal information challenging the evaluation. The Institution shall issue its written determination of disqualification or ineligibility based on all information in the possession of the Institution, including any rebuttal information, within five business days of the date the Institution received such rebuttal information.

If the evaluation reveals that the bidder, offeror or contractor should be allowed permission to participate in the public contract, the Institution shall cancel the proposed disqualification action. If the evaluation reveals that the bidder should be refused permission to participate, or disqualified from participation, in the public contract, the Institution shall so notify the bidder, offeror or contractor. The notice shall state the basis for the determination, which shall be final unless the bidder appeals the decision within 10 days after receipt of the notice by invoking administrative procedures meeting the standards of § 55 of these Rules, if available, or in the alternative by instituting legal action as provided in § 54.

B. If, upon appeal, it is determined that the action taken was arbitrary or capricious, or not in accordance with the Constitution of Virginia, applicable state law or regulations, the sole relief shall be restoration of eligibility.

§ 48. Appeal of denial of withdrawal of bid. –

A. A decision denying withdrawal of bid under the provisions of § 23 of these Rules shall be final and conclusive unless the bidder appeals the decision within 10 days after receipt of the decision by invoking administrative procedures meeting the standards of § 55, if available, or in the alternative by instituting legal action as provided in § 54.

B. If no bid bond was posted, a bidder refused withdrawal of a bid under the provisions of § 23, prior to appealing, shall deliver to the Institution a certified check or cash bond in the amount of the difference between the bid sought to be withdrawn and the next low bid. Such security shall be released only upon a final determination that the bidder was entitled to withdraw the bid.

C. If, upon appeal, it is determined that the decision refusing withdrawal of the bid was not (i) an honest exercise of discretion, but rather was arbitrary or capricious or (ii) in accordance with the Constitution of Virginia, applicable state law or regulation, or the terms or conditions of the Invitation to Bid, the sole relief shall be withdrawal of the bid.

§ 49. Determination of nonresponsibility. –

A. Following public opening and announcement of bids received on an Invitation to Bid, the Institution shall evaluate the bids in accordance with element 4 of the definition of "Competitive sealed bidding" in § 4 of these Rules. At the same time, the Institution shall determine whether the apparent low bidder is responsible. If the Institution so determines, then it may proceed with an award in accordance with element 5 of the definition of "Competitive sealed bidding" in § 4. If the Institution determines that the apparent low bidder is not responsible, it shall proceed as follows:

1. Prior to the issuance of a written determination of nonresponsibility, the Institution shall (i) notify the apparent low bidder in writing of the results of the evaluation, (ii) disclose the factual support for the determination, and (iii) allow the apparent low bidder an opportunity to inspect any documents that relate to the determination, if so requested by the bidder within five business days after receipt of the notice.

2. Within 10 business days after receipt of the notice, the bidder may submit rebuttal information challenging the evaluation. The Institution shall issue its written determination of responsibility based on all information in the possession of the Institution, including any rebuttal information, within five business days of the date the Institution received the rebuttal information. At the same time, the Institution shall notify, with return receipt requested, the bidder in writing of its determination.

3. Such notice shall state the basis for the determination, which shall be final unless the bidder appeals the decision within 10 days after receipt of the notice by invoking administrative procedures meeting the standards of § 55 of these Rules, if available, or in the alternative by instituting legal action as provided in § 54.

The provisions of this subsection shall not apply to procurements involving the prequalification of bidders and the rights of any potential bidders under such prequalification to appeal a decision that such bidders are not responsible.

B. If, upon appeal pursuant to § 54 or 55 of these Rules, it is determined that the decision of the Institution was not (i) an honest exercise of discretion, but rather was arbitrary or capricious or (ii) in accordance with the Constitution of Virginia, applicable state law or regulation, or the terms or conditions of the Invitation to Bid, and the award of the contract in question has not been made, the sole relief shall be a finding that the bidder is a responsible bidder for the contract in question or directed award as provided in subsection A of § 54, or both.

If it is determined that the decision of the Institution was not an honest exercise of discretion, but rather was arbitrary or capricious or not in accordance with the Constitution of Virginia, applicable state law or regulation, or the terms or conditions of the Invitation to Bid, and an award of the contract has been made, the relief shall be as set forth in subsection B of § 54 of these Rules.

C. A bidder contesting a determination that he is not a responsible bidder for a particular contract shall proceed under this section, and may not protest the award or proposed award under the provisions of § 50 of these Rules.

D. Nothing contained in this section shall be construed to require the Institution, when procuring by competitive negotiation, to furnish a statement of the reasons why a particular proposal was not deemed to be the most advantageous.

§ 50. Protest of award or decision to award. –

A. Any bidder or offeror, who desires to protest the award or decision to award a contract shall submit the protest in writing to the Institution, or an official designated by the Institution, no later than 10 days after the award or the announcement of the decision to award, whichever occurs first. Public notice of the award or the announcement of the decision to award shall be given by the Institution in the manner prescribed in the terms or conditions of the Invitation to Bid or Request for Proposal. Any potential bidder or offeror on a contract negotiated on a sole source or emergency basis who desires to protest the award or decision to award such contract shall submit the protest in the same manner no later than 10 days after posting or publication of the notice of such contract as provided in § 5 of these Rules. However, if the protest of any actual or potential bidder or offeror depends in whole or in part upon information contained in public records pertaining to the procurement transaction that are subject to inspection under § 34 of these Rules, then the time within which the protest shall be submitted shall expire 10 days after those records are available for inspection by such bidder or offeror under § 34, or at such later time as provided in this section. No protest shall lie for a claim that the selected bidder or offeror is not a responsible bidder or offeror. The written protest shall include the basis for the protest and the relief sought. The Institution or designated official shall issue a decision in writing within 10 days stating the reasons for the action taken. This decision shall be final unless the bidder or offeror appeals within 10 days of receipt of the written decision by invoking administrative procedures meeting the standards of § 55 of these Rules, if available, or in the alternative by instituting legal action as provided in § 54. Nothing in this subsection shall be construed to permit a bidder to challenge the validity of the terms or conditions of the Invitation to Bid or Request for Proposal. The use of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) shall constitute an administrative appeal procedure meeting the standards of § 55 of these Rules.

B. If prior to an award it is determined that the decision to award is arbitrary or capricious, then the sole relief shall be a finding to that effect. The Institution shall cancel the proposed award or revise it to comply with the law. If, after an award, it is determined that an award of a contract was arbitrary or capricious, then the sole relief shall be as hereinafter provided. Where the award has been made but performance has not begun, the performance of the contract may be enjoined. Where the award has been made and performance has begun, the Institution may declare the contract void upon a finding that this action is in the best interest of the public. Where a contract is declared void, the performing contractor shall be compensated for the cost of performance up to the time of such declaration. In no event shall the performing contractor be entitled to lost profits.

C. Where the Institution, an official designated by it, or an appeals board determines, after a hearing held following reasonable notice to all bidders, that there is probable cause to believe that a decision to award was based on fraud or corruption or on an act in violation of these Rules, the Institution, designated official or appeals board may enjoin the award of the contract to a particular bidder.

§ 51. Effect of appeal upon contract. –

Pending final determination of a protest or appeal, the validity of a contract awarded and accepted in good faith in accordance with these Rules shall not be affected by the fact that a protest or appeal has been filed.

§ 52. Stay of award during protest. –

An award need not be delayed for the period allowed a bidder or offeror to protest, but in the event of a timely protest as provided in § 50 of these Rules, or the filing of a timely legal action as provided in § 54, no further action to award the contract shall be taken unless there is a written determination that proceeding without delay is necessary to protect the public interest or unless the bid or offer would expire.

§ 53. Contractual disputes. –

A. Contractual claims, whether for money or other relief, shall be submitted in writing no later than 60 days after final payment. However, written notice of the contractor's intention to file a claim shall be given at the time of the occurrence or beginning of the work upon which the claim is based. Nothing herein shall preclude a contract from requiring submission of an invoice for final payment within a certain time after completion and acceptance of the work or acceptance of the goods. Pendency of claims shall not delay payment of amounts agreed due in the final payment.

B. The Institution shall include in its contracts a procedure for consideration of contractual claims. Such procedure, which may be contained in the contract or may be specifically incorporated into the contract by reference and made available to the contractor, shall establish a time limit for a final decision in writing by the Institution. If the Institution has established administrative procedures meeting the standards of § 55 of these Rules, such procedures shall be contained in the contract or specifically incorporated in the contract by reference and made available to the contractor. The Institution may require the submission of contractual claims pursuant to any contract to Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) as an administrative procedure.

C. A contractor may not invoke administrative procedures meeting the standards of § 55 of these Rules, if available, or institute legal action as provided in § 54, prior to receipt of the Institution's decision on the claim, unless the Institution fails to render such decision within the time specified in the contract.

D. The decision of the Institution shall be final and conclusive unless the contractor appeals within six months of the date of the final decision on the claim by the Institution by invoking administrative procedures meeting the standards of § 55 of these Rules, if available, or in the alternative by instituting legal action as provided in § 54.

§ 54. Legal actions. –

A. A bidder or offeror, actual or prospective, who is refused permission or disqualified from participation in bidding or competitive negotiation, or who is determined not to be a responsible bidder or offeror for a particular contract, may bring an action in the appropriate circuit court challenging that decision, which shall be reversed only if the petitioner establishes that the decision was not (i) an honest exercise of discretion, but rather was arbitrary or capricious; (ii) in accordance with the Constitution of Virginia, applicable state law or regulation, or the terms or conditions of the Invitation to Bid; or (iii) in the case of denial of prequalification, based upon the criteria for denial of prequalification set forth in subsection B of § 14 of these Rules. In the event the apparent low bidder, having been previously determined by the Institution to be not responsible in accordance with § 4, is found by the court to be a responsible bidder, the court may direct the Institution to award the contract to such bidder in accordance with the requirements of this section and the Invitation to Bid.

B. A bidder denied withdrawal of a bid under § 23 of these Rules may bring an action in the appropriate circuit court challenging that decision, which shall be reversed only if the bidder establishes that the decision of the Institution was not (i) an honest exercise of discretion, but rather was arbitrary or capricious or (ii) in accordance with the Constitution of Virginia, applicable state law or regulation, or the terms or conditions of the Invitation to Bid.

C. A bidder, offeror or contractor, or a potential bidder or offeror on a contract negotiated on a sole source or emergency basis in the manner provided in § 5 of these Rules, whose protest of an award or decision to award under § 50 of these Rules is denied, may bring an action in the appropriate circuit court challenging a proposed award or the award of a contract, which shall be reversed only if the petitioner establishes that the proposed award or the award is not (i) an honest exercise of discretion, but rather is arbitrary or capricious or (ii) in accordance with the Constitution of Virginia, applicable state law or regulation, or the terms and conditions of the Invitation to Bid or Request for Proposal.

D. If injunctive relief is granted, the court, upon request of the Institution, shall require the posting of reasonable security to protect the Institution.

E. A contractor may bring an action involving a contract dispute with the Institution in the appropriate circuit court. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Comptroller shall not be named as a defendant in any action brought pursuant to these Rules or § 33.1-387 of the Code of Virginia, except for disputes involving contracts of the Office of the Comptroller or the Department of Accounts.

F. A bidder, offeror or contractor need not utilize administrative procedures meeting the standards of § 55 of these Rules, if available, but if those procedures are invoked by the bidder, offeror or contractor, the procedures shall be exhausted prior to instituting legal action concerning the same procurement transaction unless the Institution agrees otherwise.

G. Nothing herein shall be construed to prevent the Institution from instituting legal action against a contractor.

§ 55. Administrative appeals procedure. –

A. The Institution may establish an administrative procedure for hearing (i) protests of a decision to award or an award, (ii) appeals from refusals to allow withdrawal of bids, (iii) appeals from disqualifications and determinations of nonresponsibility, and (iv) appeals from decisions on disputes arising during the performance of a contract, or (v) any of these. Such administrative procedure may include the use of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) or shall provide for a hearing before a disinterested person or panel, the opportunity to present pertinent information and the issuance of a written decision containing findings of fact. The disinterested person or panel shall not be an employee of the governmental entity against whom the claim has been filed. The findings of fact shall be final and conclusive and shall not be set aside unless the same are (a) fraudulent, arbitrary or capricious; (b) so grossly erroneous as to imply bad faith; or (c) in the case of denial of prequalification, the findings were not based upon the criteria for denial of prequalification set forth in subsection B of § 14 of these Rules. No determination on an issue of law shall be final if appropriate legal action is instituted in a timely manner. The Institution may seek advice and input from the Alternative Dispute Resolution Council in establishing an Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) procedure.

B. Any party to the administrative procedure, including the Institution, shall be entitled to institute judicial review if such action is brought within 30 days of receipt of the written decision.

§ 56. Alternative dispute resolution. –

The Institution may enter into agreements to submit disputes arising from contracts entered into pursuant to these Rules to arbitration and utilize mediation and other alternative dispute resolution procedures. However, such procedures shall be nonbinding and subject to § 2.2-514 of the Code of Virginia, as applicable.

§ 57. Ethics in public contracting. –

The Institution and its governing body, officers and employees shall be governed by the Ethics in Public Contracting provisions of the Virginia Public Procurement Act, Article 6 (§ 2.2-4367 et seq.) of Chapter 43 of Title 2.2 of the Code of Virginia.

ATTACHMENT 2

Memorandum of Agreement

The Commonwealth of Virginia and Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

ERP/SciQuest Implementation with eVA

The Commonwealth of Virginia (CoVA) and Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University (University) agree to the following:

I. The University will use ERP/SciQuest integration as best fits its needs with its ERP system (Banner).

II. Initially, all nonexempt orders produced by the ERP/SciQuest integration will be transmitted to eVA through an ERP-to-eVA interface that conforms to the existing eVA interface standard format. Longer term a more real-time option may be mutually agreed by the Department of General Services/Division of Purchasing and Supply (DGS/DPS) and the University and implemented between the ERP and eVA systems.

III. The University may request that eVA contract vendors provide a version of their contract catalog for loading into ERP/SciQuest. Should the vendor indicate a preference to only provide its catalog through eVA, then the University will access these catalogs as described in item B8 of the Metrics section of this document. In any event, the University shall be responsible for payment of all eVA transaction fees for nonexempt orders to unregistered vendors and exempt orders the University chooses to issue to unregistered and registered vendors through eVA.

IV. eVA will load all nonexempt University orders into the eVA Data Warehouse. For clarity, it is understood that exempt orders are purchase transactions specifically exempted, in writing by DPS, from mandatory processing through eVA.

V. In lieu of processing individual orders for requirements through eVA, a more efficient administrative approach is to establish a blanket or standing order. The University is authorized to use such an approach where it makes good business sense. The University will ensure vendors understand that eVA transaction fees will be invoiced at the time blanket or standing orders are issued, that the transaction fee will be based on the total order amount, and the vendor is required to pay the total transaction fee within 30 days of the invoice date regardless of the performance/delivery schedule specified in the order.

VI. eVA will deliver University nonexempt orders to vendors that are identified as accepting electronic orders (Fax, Email, EDI, cXML). The University or SciQuest will print/mail/deliver all other orders to vendors. Whereas the University maintains a University specific electronic vendor record that identifies vendors that do not agree to the eVA terms and conditions, including payment of the eVA order transaction fee, the University may deviate from the policy/procedure set forth in Section 3 of the eVA Business Plan as follows:

A. For vendors that refuse to accept the eVA terms and conditions, the University will transmit the appropriate R02, S02, E02, or P02 Purchase Order Category and a Purchase Order Comment that includes the statement "Vendor refuses eVA terms and conditions." The University agrees that it will pay the eVA transaction fees for these orders.

B. For vendors that agree to accept the eVA terms and conditions, the University will transmit the appropriate R01, S01, E01, or P01 Purchase Order Category and a Purchase Order Comment that includes the statement "Vendor accepts eVA terms and conditions – University eVA Vendor Manager, e-mail address and phone number.” The University agrees that, for these orders, it will resolve any vendor dispute related to payment of eVA transaction fees by working directly with the vendor whether such vendor contacts the university directly or the dispute is referred to the university by DGS/DPS or CGI-AMS.

The University further agrees that:

1. It will provide the DGS/DPS eVA Business Manager (or designee) email notification of the resolution agreed to by the University and the vendor within 10 business days, unless otherwise agreed on a case-by-case basis by the DGS/DPS eVA Business Manager (or designee);

2. It will pay the eVA transaction fee unless it notifies the eVA Business Manager (or designee) within the specified time that the dispute has been resolved and the vendor agreed to pay the fee; and

3. In the event the University does not provide resolution notification to the eVA Business Manager (or designee) within the specified timeframe, DGS/DPS will automatically execute a manual adjustment reversing disputed transaction fees from the vendor to the University and the University will pay the fee.

VII. The University will not require separate vendor registrations as a prerequisite for responding to University solicitations. The University will participate in an enterprise workgroup to determine the best means to capture W-9 information on behalf of the whole enterprise. The process for collecting W-9 information will be supported in eVA in such a way as to provide CoVA verified vendor information to entities. The University will have the option to receive a subset of vendor related data. Until an enterprise W-9 process is established, the University will be responsible for collection of W-9 information.

VIII. For major system changes, DGS/DPS will collaborate in advance (advance notice defined as at least six (6) months prior to change or as soon as any new plan is proposed) with the University regarding any proposed replacement to the CoVA’s electronic procurement system and on changes that may affect the technical changes described herein.

IX. Integration of the University’s electronic procurement solution with the University’s ERP is the responsibility of the University. The solution must provide for orders, change orders and cancellations.

Guidelines

1. The establishment of this agreement is intended to formulate the basis for a long-term solution for electronic procurement between the University and the CoVA.

2. Orders may be batched and transmitted to eVA as often as needed except between the hours of 8 p.m. and 4 a.m. eVA will transmit registered vendor orders it receives within 15 minutes or less.

3. Nonexempt orders to unregistered vendors are to be transmitted to eVA for loading to the Data Warehouse. The University shall be responsible for payment of all eVA transaction fees for nonexempt orders to unregistered vendors and exempt orders the University chooses to issue to unregistered and registered vendors through eVA. See eVA Business Plan Section 3 for specific processing requirements for unregistered vendor orders.

4. Change Orders are to be transmitted to eVA as replacement orders complying with the eVA standard format.

5. Cancellations are to be transmitted to eVA complying with the eVA standard format.

6. eVA Interface standard does not currently support PCard orders; however these orders may be processed via the interface as (a) confirming orders or (b) orders for PCards on file with the vendor.

Schedule

The University shall implement this agreement no later than July 2006.

Metrics

A. The University shall comply with the following Governor’s eVA Management Objective:

~~Ninety-five~~ Eighty percent of all nonexempt orders to be processed by eVA. Includes nonexempt orders issued by end users (PCard & LPO) and the central purchasing office. Nonexempt orders to unregistered vendors received into the eVA Data Warehouse are considered compliant orders. For clarity, it is understood that exempt orders are purchase transactions specifically exempted, in writing by DPS, from mandatory processing through eVA. All nonexempt orders not processed by eVA shall be reported on the eVA Dashboard and the corresponding non-use fee paid by the University.

B. The University shall meet the following management objectives for electronic procurement:

1. Provide end users, including purchase-card users, access to an electronic system for buying;

2. Conduct business with eVA registered vendors whenever possible;

3. Place nonexempt orders, including change orders and cancellations, to eVA suppliers electronically using eVA;

4. To the greatest extent possible, transmit real-time electronic purchase orders, regardless of dollar value, that include commodity codes, complete item descriptions, quantities, and unit prices;

5. To the greatest extent feasible, the University will transmit confirming orders to eVA within five (5) business days after placing the order. Commodity codes, complete item descriptions, quantities, and unit prices will be provided for all confirming orders. DGS/DPS will provide periodic reports on the number and timeliness of confirming orders enabling the University and DGS/DPS to work together to monitor the usage of confirming orders with the objective of reducing their numbers to the extent possible.

The University agrees that, for confirming orders, it will resolve any vendor dispute, including disputes related to payment of eVA transaction fees, by working directly with the vendor whether such vendor contacts the University directly or the dispute is referred to the University by DGS/DPS or CGI-AMS.

The University further agrees that:

a. It will provide the DGS/DPS eVA Business Manager (or designee) email notification of the resolution agreed to by the university and the vendor within 10 business days, unless otherwise agreed on a case-by-case basis by the DGS/DPS eVA Business Manager (or designee);

b. It will pay the eVA transaction fee unless it notifies the eVA Business Manager (or designee) within the specified time that the dispute has been resolved and the vendor agreed to pay the fee; and

c. In the event the University does not provide resolution notification to the eVA Business Manager (or designee) within the specified timeframe, DGS/DPS will automatically execute a manual adjustment reversing disputed transaction fees from the vendor to the University and the University will pay the fee.

6. Timely process electronic change orders and cancellations;

7. Post all solicitations and business opportunities greater than $50,000 on the eVA website except as specifically exempted by DPS;

8. To the extent technically feasible, make eVA catalogs, especially contract catalogs, available to end users using the ERP/SciQuest Integration system. The University will be responsible for the accuracy of contract catalog pricing loaded into the ERP/SciQuest;

9. Use eVA electronic vendor notification for procurement opportunities (per plans to post solicitations specified in item 7 above and the use of Quick Quote/Reverse Auctions specified in item 10 below);

10. Use eVA on-line bidding functions of Quick Quote and Reverse Auction for appropriate commodities, when such are identified;

11. Complete and certify the monthly eVA Dashboard Report; and

12. Timely remit any eVA transaction and non-use fees incurred by the ~~institution~~ Institution.

C. The University shall be subject to eVA fees assessed per the eVA Business Plan.

D. The University shall assure that payments to CGI-AMS are current.

EXHIBIT F

MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT

BETWEEN

THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA

AND

VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE

AND STATE UNIVERSITY

PURSUANT TO

THE RESTRUCTURED HIGHER EDUCATION

FINANCIAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE OPERATIONS

ACT OF 2005

POLICY GOVERNING

FINANCIAL OPERATIONS AND MANAGEMENT

THE BOARD OF VISITORS OF VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE

AND STATE UNIVERSITY

POLICY GOVERNING FINANCIAL OPERATIONS AND MANAGEMENT

I. PREAMBLE.

The Restructured Higher Education Financial and Administrative Operations Act (the Act), Chapter 4.10 (§ 23-38.88 et seq.) of Title 23 of the Code of Virginia, establishes by law a process for granting additional authority to institutions of higher education for financial operations and management, subject to the adoption of policies by their governing boards and the approval of management agreements to be negotiated with the Commonwealth. The following provisions of this Policy constitute the adopted Board of Visitors policies regarding Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University’s financial operations and management.

II. DEFINITIONS.

As used in this policy, the following terms shall have the following meanings, unless the context requires otherwise:

“Act” means the Restructured Higher Education Financial and Administrative Operations Act, Chapter 4.10 (§ 23-38.88 et seq.) of Title 23 of the Code of Virginia.

“Board of Visitors” or “Board” means the Board of Visitors of Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.

“Covered Institution” means, on or after the Effective Date of its initial Management Agreement with the Commonwealth of Virginia, a public institution of higher education of the Commonwealth that has entered into a Management Agreement with the Commonwealth to be governed by the provisions of Subchapter 3 of the Act.

“Effective Date” means the effective date of the initial Management Agreement between the University and the Commonwealth.

“Management Agreement” means the agreement required by subsection D of § 23-38.88 of the Act between the University and the Commonwealth of Virginia.

“State Tax Supported Debt” means bonds, notes or other obligations issued under Article X, Section 9(a), 9(b), or 9(c), or 9(d), if the debt service payments are made or ultimately are to be made from general government funds, as defined in the December 20, 2004 Report to the Governor and General Assembly of the Debt Capacity Advisory Committee or as that definition is amended from time to time.

III. SCOPE OF POLICY.

This Policy applies to the University’s responsibility for management, investment and stewardship of all its financial resources, including but not limited to, general, non-general and private funds. This responsibility includes maintaining an independent uniform system of accounting, financial reporting, and internal controls adequate to protect and account for the University’s financial resources.

Virginia Cooperative Extension and the Agriculture Experiment Station Division shall receive the benefits of this Policy as it is implemented by the University on behalf of Virginia Cooperative Extension and the Agriculture Experiment Station Division, but Virginia Cooperative Extension and the Agriculture Experiment Station Division shall not receive any additional independent financial operations and management authority as a result of this Management Agreement beyond the independent financial operations and management authority that it had prior to the Effective Date of the University’s initial Management Agreement with the Commonwealth or that it may be granted by law in the future.

IV. BOARD OF VISITORS ACCOUNTABILITY AND DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY.

V. FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT AND REPORTING SYSTEM.

The President, acting through the Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, shall continue to be authorized by the Board to maintain existing and implement new policies governing the management of University financial resources. These policies shall continue to (i) ensure compliance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, (ii) ensure consistency with the current accounting principles employed by the Commonwealth, including the use of fund accounting principles, with regard to the establishment of the underlying accounting records of the University and the allocation and utilization of resources within the accounting system, including the relevant guidance provided by the State Council of Higher Education for Virginia chart of accounts with regard to the allocation and proper use of funds from specific types of fund sources, (iii) provide adequate risk management and internal controls to protect and safeguard all financial resources, including moneys transferred to the University pursuant to a general fund appropriation, and ensure compliance with the requirements of the Appropriation Act.

The financial management system shall continue to include a financial reporting system to satisfy both the requirements for inclusion into the Commonwealth’s Comprehensive Annual Financial Report, as specified in the related State Comptroller’s Directives, and the University’s separately audited financial statements. To ensure observance of limitations and restrictions placed on the use of the resources available to the University, the accounting and bookkeeping system of the University shall continue to be maintained in accordance with the principles prescribed for governmental organizations by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board.

In addition, the financial management system shall continue to provide financial reporting for the President, acting through the Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, and the Board of Visitors to enable them to provide adequate oversight of the financial operations of the University. Upon the Effective Date of the initial Management Agreement between the University and the Commonwealth, except for the recordation of daily revenue deposits of State funds as specified in Section VII below, the University shall not be required to record its financial transactions in the Commonwealth’s Accounting and Reporting System (CARS), including the current monthly interfacing with CARS, or to record its financial transactions in any subsequent Commonwealth financial systems that replace CARS or are in addition to CARS, but shall have its own financial reporting system. The University’s financial reporting system shall provide (i) summary monthly reports for State agencies including, but not limited to, the Department of Accounts, the Department of Planning and Budget, the Joint Legislative Audit and Review Commission, the Auditor of Public Accounts, and the State Council of Higher Education for Virginia, and for the Chairmen of the Senate Committee on Finance and the House Committee on Appropriations at a sufficient level of detail, on such schedule, and using such format that is compatible with the Commonwealth’s accounting system, as may be requested by the requesting State agency, and (ii) such other special reports as may be requested from time to time.

VI. FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT POLICIES.

The President, acting through the Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, shall create and implement any and all financial management policies necessary to establish a financial management system with adequate risk management and internal control processes and procedures for the effective protection and management of all University financial resources. Such policies will not address the underlying accounting principles and policies employed by the Commonwealth and the University, but rather will focus on the internal operations of the University's financial management. These policies shall include, but need not be limited to, the development of a tailored set of finance and accounting practices that seek to support the University's specific business and administrative operating environment in order to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of its business and administrative functions. In general, the system of independent financial management policies shall be guided by the general principles contained in the Commonwealth’s Accounting Policies and Procedures such as establishing strong risk management and internal accounting controls to ensure University financial resources are properly safeguarded and that appropriate stewardship of public funds is obtained through management’s oversight of the effective and efficient use of such funds in the performance of University programs.

Upon the Effective Date of its initial Management Agreement with the Commonwealth, the University shall continue to follow the Commonwealth’s accounting policies until such time as specific alternate policies can be developed, approved and implemented. Such alternate policies shall include applicable accountability measures and shall be submitted to the State Comptroller for review and comment before they are implemented by the University.

VII. FINANCIAL RESOURCE RETENTION AND MANAGEMENT.

Under § 23-38.104(A)(i) of the Act, subject to applicable accountability measures and audits, the University shall have the power and authority to manage all monies received by it. All State general funds to be allocated to the University shall remain subject to the appropriations process.

Pursuant to subsection C of § 23-9.6:1.01 of the Code of Virginia, the State Council of Higher Education for Virginia (SCHEV) annually shall assess and certify to the Governor and General Assembly the degree to which each public institution of higher education of the Commonwealth has met the financial and administrative management and educational-related performance benchmarks called for by that subsection and approved as part of the Appropriation Act then in effect for the State goals and objectives set forth in subdivisions B 1 through B 11 of § 23-38.88 of the Act. Pursuant to § 2.2-5005 of the Code of Virginia, beginning with the fiscal year that immediately follows the first full fiscal year for which the financial and administrative management and educational-related performance benchmarks described in § 23-9.6:1.01 of the Code of Virginia, are effective, as provided in a general Appropriation Act, and for all fiscal years thereafter, each public institution of higher education of the Commonwealth that (i) has been certified during the fiscal year by SCHEV as having met such institutional performance benchmarks and (ii) meets the conditions prescribed in subsection B of § 23-38.88 of the Act, shall receive certain financial incentives, including the interest on the tuition and fees and other non-general fund Educational and General Revenues deposited into the State Treasury by the public institution of higher education.

Consistent with the prior paragraph, beginning with the fiscal year following the first fiscal year for which it has received such certification from SCHEV, the University is authorized to hold and invest tuition, Educational and General (E&G) fees, research and sponsored program funds, auxiliary enterprise funds, and all other non-general fund revenues subject to the following requirements:

i) The University shall deposit such funds in the State Treasury pursuant to the State process in place at the time of such deposit;.

ii) Such non-general funds deposited in the State Treasury shall be disbursed as provided in Section IX below;.

iii) The University shall remit to the State Comptroller quarterly and the State Comptroller shall hold in escrow all interest earned on the University's tuition and fees and other non-general fund Educational and General Revenues. Interest earned on the escrow account shall be deposited to the account. Upon receipt of the required State Council of Higher Education for Virginia certification that the University has met such institutional performance benchmarks and the conditions prescribed in subsection B of § 23-38.88 of the Act, the Governor shall include in the next budget bill a non-general fund appropriation, payable no later than July 1 of the immediately following fiscal year, equivalent to the amount deposited in the escrow account as the financial incentive provided in subdivision 1 of § 2.2-5005, after which time the University may expend the funds for purposes related to its mission. If public institutions of higher education of the Commonwealth are permitted, or the University in particular is permitted, by the Appropriation Act or other law to retain or be paid the interest the Commonwealth would have earned on sponsored programs and research funds, then this paragraph shall not apply to such interest on such funds, and such interest shall not be held in escrow.

iv) If in any given year the University does not receive the certification from the State Council of Higher Education for Virginia that it has met for that year the institutional benchmarks called for by subsection C of § 23-9.6:1.01 and approved in the then-current Appropriation Act, the Comptroller shall transfer to the general fund the balance in the escrow account as of June 30 of that year.

v) Beginning on the effective date of its initial Management Agreement with the University until the beginning of the first fiscal year following the fiscal year for which it has received the required certification from SCHEV, the University shall continue to deposit tuition and all other non-general funds with the State Treasurer by the same process that it would have been required to use if it had not entered into a Management Agreement with the Commonwealth.

vi) On the first business day of the first fiscal year following the fiscal year for which it has received the required certification from SCHEV, the University may draw down all cash balances held by the State Treasurer on behalf of the University related to tuition, E&G fees, research and sponsored programs, auxiliary enterprises, and all other non-general fund revenues.

vii) The Commonwealth shall retain all funds related to general fund appropriations, but shall pay these funds to the University as specified in Section IX below.

The University also shall have sum sufficient appropriation authority for all non-general funds as approved by the Governor and the General Assembly in the Commonwealth’s biennial appropriations process, and shall report to the Department of Planning and Budget (i) its estimate of the non-general fund revenues for the sum sufficient appropriation to be included in the biennial Budget Bill for each of the two years in the next biennium by November 1 of each odd numbered year and the estimate to be included in the Budget Bill for the first and second year of the then-current biennium by November 1 of each even numbered year, and (ii) report its actual non-general fund revenues for each fiscal year to the Department of Planning and Budget by July 31 of the subsequent fiscal year.

The Board of Visitors shall retain the authority to establish tuition, fee, room, board, and other charges, with appropriate commitment provided to need-based grant aid for middle- and lower-income undergraduate Virginians. Except as provided otherwise in the Appropriation Act then in effect, it is the intent of the Commonwealth and the University that the University shall be exempt from the revenue restrictions in the general provisions of the Appropriation Act related to non-general funds. In addition, unless prohibited by the Appropriation Act then in effect, it is the intent of the Commonwealth and the University that the University shall be entitled to retain non-general fund savings generated from changes in Commonwealth rates and charges, including but not limited to health, life, and disability insurance rates, retirement contribution rates, telecommunications charges, and utility rates, rather than reverting such savings back to the Commonwealth. This financial resource policy assists the University by providing the framework for retaining and managing non-general funds, for the receipt of general funds, and for the use and stewardship of all these funds.

The President, acting through the Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, shall continue to provide oversight of the University’s cash management system which is the framework for the retention of non-general funds. The Internal Audit Department of the University shall periodically audit the University’s cash management system in accordance with appropriate risk assessment models and make reports to the Audit and Compliance Committee of the Board of Visitors. Additional oversight shall continue to be provided through the annual audit and assessment of internal controls performed by the Auditor of Public Accounts. For the receipt of general and non-general funds, the University shall conform to the Security for Public Deposits Act, Chapter 44 (§ 2.2-4400 et seq.) of Title 2.2 of the Code of Virginia as it currently exists and from time to time may be amended.

VIII. ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE MANAGEMENT AND COLLECTION.

The President, through the Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, shall continue to be authorized to create and implement any and all Accounts Receivable Management and Collection policies as part of a system for the management of University financial resources. The policies shall be guided by the requirements of the Virginia Debt Collection Act, Chapter 48 (§ 2.2-4800 et seq.) of the Code of Virginia, such that the University shall take all appropriate and cost effective actions to aggressively collect accounts receivable in a timely manner.

These shall include, but not be limited to, establishing the criteria for granting credit to University customers; establishing the nature and timing of collection procedures within the above general principles; and the independent authority to select and contract with collection agencies and, after consultation with the Office of the Attorney General, private attorneys as needed to perform any and all collection activities for all University accounts receivable such as reporting delinquent accounts to credit bureaus, obtaining judgments, garnishments, and liens against such debtors, and other actions. In accordance with sound collection activities, the University shall continue to utilize the Commonwealth’s Debt Set-Off Collection Programs, shall develop procedures acceptable to the Tax Commissioner and the State Comptroller to implement such Programs, and shall provide a quarterly summary report of receivables to the Department of Accounts in accordance with the reporting procedures established pursuant to the Virginia Debt Collection Act.

IX. DISBURSEMENT MANAGEMENT.

The President, acting through the Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, shall continue to be authorized to create and implement any and all disbursement policies as part of a system for the management of University financial resources. The disbursement management policies shall continue to define the appropriate and reasonable uses of all funds, from whatever source derived, in the execution of the University’s operations. These policies also shall continue to address the timing of appropriate and reasonable disbursements consistent with the Prompt Payment Act, and the appropriateness of certain goods or services relative to the University’s mission, including travel-related disbursements. Further, the University’s disbursement policy shall continue to provide for the mechanisms by which payments are made including the use of charge cards, warrants, and electronic payments. Since the University no longer will interface to the CARS system or any replacement for the CARS system for disbursements, the University shall establish its own mechanisms for electronic payments to vendors through Electronic Data Interchange (EDI) or similar process and payments to the Commonwealth’s Debt Set-Off Collection Programs.

Beginning with the fiscal year after the first fiscal year for which it first receives the required certification from SCHEV, the University may draw down its general fund appropriations (subject to available cash) and tuition and E&G fees and other non-general fund revenues from the State Treasury. Such funds shall be available to the University for disbursement as provided in the then-current rules of the Automated Clearing House (ACH) Network. The draw down of funds may be initiated in accordance with the following schedule:

i) The University may draw down one-twenty-fourth (1/24) of its annual general fund appropriation for Educational and General programs on or about the first and fifteenth days of each month with adjustments needed to meet short-term cash requirements associated with the Commonwealth's bi-monthly pay dates, and up to 50% of its annual general fund appropriation for Student Financial Assistance on or after September 1 of each year with the remaining 50% to be drawn on or after February 1 of each year in order to meet student obligations;

ii) The University may draw down the sum of all tuition and E&G fees and all other nongeneral revenues deposited to the State Treasury each day on the same business day they were deposited; and

iii) The University anticipates that expenditures could exceed available revenues from time to time during the year if the above disbursement schedule is used. When the University projects a cash deficit is likely in activities supported by general fund appropriations, the University may make a request to the State Comptroller for an early draw on its appropriated general funds deposited in the State Treasury, in a form and within a timeframe agreeable to the parties, in order to cover expenditures.

These disbursement policies shall authorize the President, acting through the Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, to independently select, engage, and contract for such consultants, accountants, and financial experts, and other such providers of expert advice and consultation, and, after consultation with the Office of the Attorney General, private attorneys, as may be necessary or desirable in his or her discretion. The policies also shall continue to include the ability to locally manage and administer the Commonwealth’s credit card and cost recovery programs related to disbursements, subject to any restrictions contained in the Commonwealth’s contracts governing those programs, provided that the University shall submit the credit card and cost recovery aspects of its financial and operations policies to the State Comptroller for review and comment prior to implementing those aspects of those policies. The disbursement policies shall ensure that adequate risk management and internal control procedures shall be maintained over previously decentralized processes for public records, payroll, and non-payroll disbursements. The University shall continue to provide summary quarterly prompt payment reports to the Department of Accounts in accordance with the reporting procedures established pursuant to the Prompt Payment Act.

The University’s disbursement policies shall be guided by the principles of the Commonwealth’s policies as included in the Commonwealth’s Accounting Policy and Procedures Manual. Upon the Effective Date of its initial Management Agreement with the Commonwealth, the University shall continue to follow the Commonwealth’s disbursement policies until such time as specific alternative policies can be developed, approved and implemented. Such alternate policies shall be submitted to the State Comptroller for review and comment prior to their implementation by the University.

X. DEBT MANAGEMENT.

The President, acting through the Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, shall continue to be authorized to create and implement any and all debt management policies as part of a system for the management of University financial resources.

Pursuant to § 23-38.108(B) of the Act, the University shall have the authority to issue bonds, notes, or other obligations that do not constitute State Tax Supported Debt, as determined by the Treasury Board, and that are consistent with debt capacity and management policies and guidelines established by its Board of Visitors, without obtaining the consent of any legislative body, elected official, commission, board, bureau, or agency of the Commonwealth or of any political subdivision, and without any proceedings or conditions other than those specifically required by Subchapter 3 of the Act; provided that, the University shall notify the Treasurer of Virginia of its intention to issue bonds pursuant to this Policy at the time it adopts the bond issuance planning schedule for those bonds. Any new or revised debt capacity and management policy shall be submitted to the Treasurer of Virginia for review and comment prior to its adoption by the University.

The University recognizes that there are numerous types of financing structures and funding sources available each with specific benefits, risks, and costs. All potential funding sources shall be reviewed by the President, acting through the Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, within the context of the overall portfolio to ensure that any financial product or structure is consistent with the University’s objectives. Regardless of the financing structure(s) utilized, the President, acting through the Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, shall obtain sufficient documentation to gain a full understanding of the transaction, including (i) the identification of potential risks and benefits, and (ii) an analysis of the impact on University creditworthiness and debt capacity. All such debt or financial products issued pursuant to the provisions of §§ 23.38-107 and 23.38-108 of the Act shall be authorized by resolution of the Board, providing that they do not constitute State Tax Supported Debt.

XI. INVESTMENT POLICY.

It is the policy of the University to invest its operating and reserve funds solely in the interest of the University and in a manner that will provide the highest investment return with the maximum security while meeting daily cash flow demands and conforming to the Investment of Public Funds Act (§ 2.2-4500 et seq.) of the Code of Virginia). Investments shall be made with the care, skill, prudence and diligence under the circumstances then prevailing that a prudent person acting in a like capacity and familiar with such matters would use in the conduct of an enterprise of a like character and with like aims.

Endowment investments shall be invested and managed in accordance with the Uniform Management of Institutional Funds Act, §§ 55-268.1 through 55-268.10, and § 23-76.1 of the Code of Virginia.

The Board of Visitors shall periodically review and approve the investment guidelines governing the University’s operating and reserve funds.

XII. INSURANCE AND RISK MANAGEMENT.

By July 1 of each odd-numbered year, the University shall inform the Secretary of Finance of any intent during the next biennium to withdraw from any insurance or risk management program made available to the University through the Commonwealth’s Division of Risk Management and in which the University is then participating, to enable the Commonwealth to complete an adverse selection analysis of any such decision and to determine the additional costs to the Commonwealth that would result from any such withdrawal. If upon notice of such additional costs to the Commonwealth, the University proceeds to withdraw from the insurance or risk management program, the University shall reimburse the Commonwealth for all such additional costs attributable to such withdrawal as determined by the Commonwealth's actuaries. Such payment shall be made in a manner agreeable to both the University and the Commonwealth.

EXHIBIT G

MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT

BETWEEN

THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA

AND

THE COLLEGE OF WILLIAM AND MARY IN VIRGINIA

PURSUANT TO

THE RESTRUCTURED HIGHER EDUCATION

FINANCIAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE OPERATIONS

ACT OF 2005

POLICY GOVERNING CAPITAL PROJECTS

THE RECTOR AND VISITORS OF

THE COLLEGE OF WILLIAM AND MARY IN VIRGINIA

POLICY GOVERNING CAPITAL PROJECTS

I. PREAMBLE.

The Restructured Higher Education Financial and Administrative Operations Act (the Act), Chapter 4.10 of Title 23 of the Code of Virginia, provides that, upon becoming a Covered Institution, the College of William and Mary in Virginia may be delegated the authority to establish its own system for undertaking the implementation of its capital projects. In general, status as a Covered Institution is designed to replace the post-authorization system of reviews, approvals, policies and procedures carried out by a variety of central State agencies, and also the traditional pre-authorization approval process for projects funded entirely with non-general funds and without any proceeds from State Tax Supported Debt. The College's system for carrying out its capital outlay process as a Covered Institution is to be governed by policies adopted by the Board of Visitors. The following provisions of this Policy, together with the Policy Governing the Procurement of Goods, Services, Insurance, and Construction, and the Disposition of Surplus Materials adopted by the Board, and the Rules Governing Procurement of Goods, Services, Insurance, and Construction, which is attached as Attachment 1 to that Policy, constitute the adopted Board of Visitors policies regarding the College’s capital projects, whether funded by a state general fund appropriation, State Tax Supported Debt, or funding from other sources.

This Policy is intended to encompass and implement the authority that may be granted to the College pursuant to Subchapter 3 of the Act. Any other powers and authorities granted to the College pursuant to the Appropriation Act, or any other sections of the Code of Virginia, including other provisions of the Act and the College's Enabling Legislation, are not affected by this Policy.

II. DEFINITIONS.

As used in this policy, the following terms shall have the following meanings, unless the context requires otherwise:

“Act” means the Restructured Higher Education Financial and Administrative Operations Act, Chapter 4.10 of Title 23 of the Code of Virginia.

“Board of Visitors” or “Board” means the Rector and Visitors of the College of William and Mary in Virginia.

“Capital Lease” means a lease that is defined as such within Generally Accepted Accounting Principles pursuant to the pronouncement of the Financial Accounting Standards Board.

“Capital Professional Services” means professional engineering, architecture, land surveying and landscape architecture services related to capital projects.

“College” means the College of William and Mary in Virginia, (State Agency 204), and the Virginia Institute of Marine Science, (State Agency 268).

“State Tax Supported Debt” means bonds, notes or other obligations issued under Article X, Section 9(a), 9(b), or 9(c), or 9(d), if the debit service payments are made or ultimately are to be made from general government funds, as defined in the December 20, 2004 Report to the Governor and General Assembly of the Debt Capacity Advisory Committee or as that definition is amended from time to time.

III. SCOPE OF POLICY.

This Policy provides guidance for 1) the process for developing one or more capital project programs for the College, 2) authorization of new capital projects, 3) procurement of Capital Professional Services and construction services, 4) design reviews and code approvals for capital projects, 5) environmental impact requirements, 6) building demolitions, 7) building and land acquisitions, 8) building and land dispositions, 9) project management systems, and 10) reporting requirements.

IV. BOARD OF VISITORS ACCOUNTABILITY AND DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY.

The Board of Visitors of the College shall at all times be fully and ultimately accountable for the proper fulfillment of the duties and responsibilities set forth in, and for the appropriate implementation of, this Policy. Consistent with this full and ultimate accountability, however, the Board may, pursuant to its legally permissible procedures, specifically delegate either herein or by separate Board resolution the duties and responsibilities set forth in this Policy to a person or persons within the College, who, while continuing to be fully accountable for such duties and responsibilities, may further delegate the implementation of those duties and responsibilities pursuant to the College’s usual delegation policies and procedures.

V. CAPITAL PROGRAM.

The President shall adopt a system for developing one or more capital project programs that defines or define the capital needs of the College for a given period of time consistent with the College’s published Master Plan. This process may or may not mirror the Commonwealth’s requirements for capital plans. The Board of Visitors shall approve the program for Major Capital Projects. Major Capital Projects that are to be funded entirely or in part by a general fund appropriation of the General Assembly or proceeds from State Tax Supported Debt shall follow the Commonwealth’s requirements for capital plans. The Board may approve amendments to the program for Major Capital Projects annually or more often if circumstances warrant.

It shall be College policy that each capital project program shall meet the College’s mission and institutional objectives, and be appropriately authorized by the College. Moreover, it shall be College policy that each capital project shall be of a size and scope to provide for the defined program needs, designed in accordance with all applicable building codes and handicapped accessibility standards as well as the College’s design guidelines and standards, and costed to reflect current costs and escalated to the mid-point of anticipated construction.

VI. AUTHORIZATION OF CAPITAL PROJECTS.

The Board of Visitors shall authorize the initiation of each Major Capital Project by approving its size, scope, budget, and funding. The President, acting through his designee, shall adopt procedures for approving the size, scope, budget and funding of all other capital projects. Major Capital Projects that are to be funded entirely or in part by a general fund appropriation of the General Assembly or proceeds from State Tax Supported Debt, shall require both Board of Visitors approval and those pre-appropriation approvals of the State’s governmental agencies then applicable, and shall follow the State’s process for capital budget requests.

It shall be the policy of the College that the implementation of capital projects shall be carried out so that the capital project as completed is the capital project approved by the Board for Major Capital Projects and according to the procedures adopted by the President, acting through his designee, for all other capital projects. The President shall ensure strict adherence to this requirement.

Accordingly, the budget, size and scope of a capital project shall not be materially changed beyond the plans and justifications that were the basis for the capital project's approval, either before or during construction, unless approved in advance as described above. Minor changes shall be permissible if they are determined by the President, acting through his designee, to be justified.

Major Capital Projects may be submitted for Board of Visitors authorization at any time but must include a statement of urgency if not part of the approved Major Capital Project program.

VII. PROCUREMENT OF CAPITAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AND CONSTRUCTION SERVICES.

It shall be the policy of the College that procurements shall result in the purchase of high quality services and construction at reasonable prices and shall be consistent with the Policy Governing the Procurement of Goods, Services, Insurance, and Construction, and the Disposition of Surplus Materials adopted by the Board, and with the Rules Governing Procurement of Goods, Services, Insurance, and Construction, which is attached as Attachment 1 to that Policy. Specifically, the College is committed to:

Seeking competition to the maximum practical degree, taking into account the size of the anticipated procurement, the term of the resulting contract and the likely extent of competition;

Conducting all procurements in a fair and impartial manner and avoiding any impropriety or the appearance of any impropriety prohibited by State law or College policy;

Making procurement rules clear in advance of any competition;

Providing access to the College’s business to all qualified vendors, firms and contractors, with no potential bidder or offeror excluded arbitrarily or capriciously, while allowing the flexibility to engage in cooperative procurements and to meet special needs of the College;

Including in contracts of more than $10,000 the contractor’s agreement not to discriminate against employees or applicants because of race, religion, color, sex, national origin, age, disability or other basis prohibited by State law except where there is a bona fide occupational qualification reasonably necessary to the contractor’s normal operations;

Providing for a non-discriminatory procurement process, and including appropriate and lawful provisions to effectuate fair and reasonable consideration of women-owned, minority-owned and small businesses and to promote and encourage a diversity of suppliers.

The President, acting through his designee, is authorized to develop implementing procedures for the procurement of Capital Professional Services and construction services at the College. The procedures shall implement this Policy and provide for:

A system of competitive negotiation for Capital Professional Services, including a procedure for expedited procurement of Capital Professional Services under $50,000, pursuant to (i) subdivisions 1, 2, and 3 a of the defined term "competitive negotiation" in Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Procurement of Goods, Services, Insurance, and Construction, and (ii) § 4-5.06 of the 2004-2006 Appropriation Act;

A prequalification procedure for contractors or products;

A procedure for special construction contracting methods, including but not limited to design-build and construction management contracts; and

A prompt payment procedure.

The College also may enter into cooperative arrangements with other private or public health or educational institutions, healthcare provider alliances, purchasing organizations or state agencies where, in the judgment of the College, the purposes of this Policy will be furthered.

VIII. DESIGN REVIEWS AND CODE APPROVALS.

The Board of Visitors shall review the design of all Major Capital Projects and shall provide final Major Capital Project authorization based on the size, scope and cost estimate provided with the design. Unless stipulated by the Board of Visitors at the design review, no further design reviews shall be required. For all capital projects other than Major Capital Projects, the President, acting through his designee, shall adopt procedures for design review and project authorization based on the size, scope and cost estimate provided with the design. It shall be the College’s policy that all capital projects shall be designed and constructed in accordance with applicable Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code (VUSBC) standards and the applicable accessibility code.

The President shall designate a Building Official responsible for building code compliance at the College, including the Virginia Institute of Marine Science and Richard Bland College, by either (i) hiring an individual to be the College Building Official, or (ii) continuing to use the services of the Department of General Services, Division of Engineering and Buildings, to perform the Building Official function. If option (i) is selected, the individual hired as the College Building Official shall be ~~a full-time~~ an employee of the College who has no other assigned duties or responsibilities at the institution and who is not employed by any firm or business providing facility services to the College, a registered professional architect or engineer, and certified by the Department of Housing and Community Development to perform this Building Official function. The College Building Official shall issue building permits for each capital project required by the VUSBC to have a building permit, and shall determine the suitability for occupancy of, and shall issue certifications for building occupancy for, all capital projects requiring such certification. Prior to issuing any such certification, this individual shall ensure that the VUSBC and accessibility requirements are met for that capital project and that such capital project has been inspected by the State Fire Marshal or his designee as required. When serving as the College Building Official, such individual shall organizationally report directly and exclusively to the Board of Visitors. If the College hires its own College Building Official, it shall fulfill the code review requirement by maintaining a review unit of licensed professional architects or engineers ~~supported by resources and staff~~ who are certified by the Department of Housing and Community Development in accordance with § 36-137 of the Code of Virginia for such purpose and who shall review plans, specifications and documents for compliance with building codes and standards and perform required inspections of work in progress and the completed capital project. No individual licensed professional architect or engineer hired under the College's personnel system as a member of the review unit ~~or contracted with to perform these functions~~ shall also perform other building code-related design, construction, facilities-related project management or facilities management functions for the College ~~on the same capital project~~.

IX. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORTS.

It shall be the policy of the College to assess the environmental, historic preservation, and conservation impacts of all capital projects and to minimize and otherwise mitigate all adverse impacts to the extent practicable. The College shall develop a procedure for the preparation and approval of environmental impact reports for capital projects, in accordance with State environmental, historic preservation, and conservation requirements generally applicable to capital projects otherwise meeting the definition of Major Capital Projects but, pursuant to § 23-38.109 C 1 of the Act, with a cost of $300,000 or more.

X. BUILDING DEMOLITIONS.

It shall be the policy of the College to consider the environmental and historical aspects of any proposed demolitions. The Board of Visitors shall be responsible for approving demolition requests. The College shall develop a procedure for the preparation and review of demolition requests, including any necessary reviews by the Department of Historic Resources and the Art and Architectural Review Board in accordance with State historic preservation requirements generally applicable to capital projects in the Commonwealth. Further, for any property that was acquired or constructed with funding from a general fund appropriation of the General Assembly or from proceeds from State Tax Supported Debt, general laws applicable to State owned property shall apply.

XI. BUILDING OR LAND ACQUISITIONS.

It is the policy of the College that capital projects involving building or land acquisition shall be subjected to thorough inquiry and due diligence prior to closing on the acquisition of such real property. The President, acting through his designee, shall ensure that the project management system implemented pursuant to Section XIII below provides for a review and analysis of all pertinent matters relating to the acquisition of buildings and land as any prudent purchaser would perform to the end that any building or land acquired by the College shall be suitable for its intended purpose, that the acquisition can be made without substantial risk of liability to the College and that the cost of the real property to be acquired, together with any contemplated development thereof, shall be such that compliance with the provisions of Section VI of this Policy is achieved. In addition, the President, acting through his designee, shall ensure that, where feasible and appropriate to do so, the following specific policies pertaining to the acquisition of buildings or land for capital projects are carried out.

A. Environmental and Land Use Considerations.

It is the policy of the College to reasonably cooperate with each locality affected by the acquisition. Such cooperation shall include but not be limited to furnishing any information that the locality may reasonably request and reviewing any requests by the locality with regard to any such acquisition. The College shall consider the zoning and comprehensive plan designation by the locality of the building or land and surrounding parcels, as well as any designation by State or federal agencies of historically or archeologically significant areas on the land. Nothing herein shall be construed as requiring the College to comply with local zoning laws and ordinances.

B. Infrastructure and Site Condition.

The President, acting through his designee, shall ensure that, in the case of capital projects involving the acquisition of buildings or land, the project management systems implemented under Section XIII below provide for a review of the following matters prior to acquisition of the building or land: that any land can be developed for its intended purpose without extraordinary cost; that an environmental engineer has been engaged by the College to provide an assessment of any environmental conditions on the land; that there is adequate vehicular ingress and egress to serve the contemplated use of the building or land; that utilities and other services to the land are adequate or can reasonably be provided or have been provided in the case of building acquisitions; and that the condition and grade of the soils have been examined to determine if any conditions exist that would require extraordinary site work or foundation systems.

C. Title and Survey.

A survey shall be prepared for any real property acquired, and an examination of title to the real property shall be conducted by a licensed attorney or, in the alternative, a commitment for title insurance shall be procured from a title insurance company authorized to do business in the Commonwealth. Based upon the survey and title examination or report, the President, acting through his designee, shall conclude, prior to acquisition of the real property, that title thereto will be conveyed to the College in fee simple, free and clear of all liens, encumbrances, covenants, restrictions, easements or other matters that may have a significant adverse effect upon the College's ability to own, occupy, convey or develop the real property.

D. Appraisal.

An appraisal shall be conducted of the real property to be acquired to determine its fair market value and the consistency of the fair market value with the price agreed upon by the College.

XII. BUILDING OR LAND DISPOSITIONS.

XIII. PROJECT MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS.

The President, acting through his designee, shall implement one or more systems for the management of capital projects for the College. The systems may include the delegation of project management authority to appropriate College officials, including a grant of authority to such officials to engage in further delegation of authority as the President deems appropriate.

The project management systems may include one or more reporting systems applicable to capital projects whereby College officials responsible for the management of such projects provide appropriate and timely reports to the President on the status of such projects during construction.

XIV. REPORTING REQUIREMENTS.

In addition to complying with any internal reporting systems contained in the College’s project management systems, as described in Section XIII above, the College shall comply with State reporting requirements for those Major Capital Projects funded entirely or in part by a general fund appropriation by the General Assembly or State Tax Supported Debt. Additionally, if any capital project constructs improvements on land, or renovates property, that originally was acquired or constructed in whole or in part with a general fund appropriation for that purpose or proceeds from State Tax Supported Debt, and such improvements or renovations are undertaken entirely with funds not appropriated by the General Assembly and, if the cost of such improvements or renovations is reasonably expected to exceed $2 million dollars, the decision to undertake such improvements or renovations shall be communicated as required by § 23-38.109 C 3 of the Act. As a matter of routine, the President, acting through his designee, shall report to the Department of General Services on the status of such capital projects at the initiation of the project, prior to the commencement of construction, and at the time of acceptance of any such capital project.

ATTACHMENT 1

Rules Governing Procurement of Goods, Services, Insurance, and Construction

by a Public Institution of Higher Education of the Commonwealth of Virginia

Governed by Subchapter 3 of the

Restructured Higher Education Financial and Administrative Operations Act,

Chapter 4.10 (§ 23-38.88 et seq.) of Title 23 of the Code of Virginia

In accordance with the provisions of the Restructured Higher Education Financial and Administrative Operations Act (the Act), Chapter 4.10 (§ 23-38.88 et seq.) of Title 23 of the Code of Virginia, and in particular § 23-38.110 of the Act, the governing body of a public institution of higher education of the Commonwealth of Virginia that has entered into a Management Agreement with the Commonwealth pursuant to Subchapter 3 of the Act, has adopted the following Rules Governing Procurement of Goods, Services, Insurance, and Construction to govern the procurement of goods, services, insurance, and construction by the Institution, excluding the University of Virginia Medical Center:

§ 1. Purpose. –

§ 2. Scope of Procurement Authority. –

§ 3. Competition is the Priority. –

§ 4. Definitions. –

As used in these Rules:

“Business” means any type of corporation, partnership, limited liability company, association, or sole proprietorship operated for profit.

“Competitive negotiation” is a method of contractor selection that includes the following elements:

A contract for architectural or professional engineering services relating to construction projects may be negotiated by the Institution, for multiple projects provided (i) the projects require similar experience and expertise, and (ii) the nature of the projects is clearly identified in the Request for Proposal. Under such contract, (a) the fair and reasonable prices, as negotiated, shall be used in determining the cost of each project performed, (b) the sum of all projects performed in one contract term shall be as set in the Request for Proposal; and (c) the project fee of any single project shall not exceed the term limit as set in the Request for Proposal. Any unused amounts from any contract term may be carried forward. Competitive negotiations for such contracts may result in awards to more than one offeror provided the Request for Proposal stated the potential for a multi-vendor award.
Multiphase professional services contracts satisfactory and advantageous to the Institution for environmental, location, design and inspection work regarding construction of infrastructure projects may be negotiated and awarded based on qualifications at a fair and reasonable price for the first phase only, when completion of the earlier phases is necessary to provide information critical to the negotiation of a fair and reasonable price for succeeding phases. Prior to the procurement of any such contract, the Institution shall state the anticipated intended total scope of the project and determine in writing that the nature of the work is such that the best interests of such Institution require awarding the contract.

“Competitive sealed bidding” is a method of contractor selection, other than for professional services, which includes the following elements:

3. Public opening and announcement of all bids received.

5. Award to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder. When the terms and conditions of multiple awards are so provided in the Invitation to Bid, awards may be made to more than one bidder.

“Design-build contract” means a contract between the Institution and another party in which the party contracting with the Institution agrees to both design and build the structure, roadway or other item specified in the contract.

“Goods” means all material, equipment, supplies, and printing, including information technology and telecommunications goods such as automated data processing hardware and software.

“Informality” means a minor defect or variation of a bid or proposal from the exact requirements of the Invitation to Bid, or the Request for Proposal, which does not affect the price, quality, quantity or delivery schedule for the goods, services or construction being procured.

“Multiphase professional services contract” means a contract for the providing of professional services where the total scope of work of the second or subsequent phase of the contract cannot be specified without the results of the first or prior phase of the contract.